1968
DOI: 10.1007/bf01116441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convergence and divergence systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let (X n ) n∈N ⊂ L p (Ω, A, P) be such that E n (X n ) = 0 for every n ∈ N (p > 1). Then, for every N ∈ N, we have the following maximal inequality (13) S * N,X p ≤…”
Section: Conditionally Centered Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let (X n ) n∈N ⊂ L p (Ω, A, P) be such that E n (X n ) = 0 for every n ∈ N (p > 1). Then, for every N ∈ N, we have the following maximal inequality (13) S * N,X p ≤…”
Section: Conditionally Centered Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly the Fourier series of f * is absolutely convergent, and thus, by Theorem 2 of [13], (f * (n k x)) is a convergence system for any increasing sequence (n k ) of integers.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorems 4 Andmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The sufficiency of (6) in Theorem 4 is contained in Theorem 2 of Gaposhkin [13]; note that for this part of the theorem we do not need any arithmetic assumptions on H. Similarly, in the case of Theorem 8, the sufficiency of (15) is contained in Theorem 7, again without any assumptions on H. To prove the converse statements, assume first that H is the set of primes, i.e. Clearly the Fourier series of f * is absolutely convergent, and thus, by Theorem 2 of [13], (f * (n k x)) is a convergence system for any increasing sequence (n k ) of integers.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorems 4 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations