2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventionally Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Single Institutional Long-term Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies reported transient tumor volume increase rates varying between 5-74% among patients treated with SRS [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and a 48% rate among patients treated with FSRT [32]. A recent study showed that transient tumor progression after FRST can occur up to three years and is more frequent in larger tumors (> 3 cm) [33]. Some studies found a correlation between tumor enlargement and initial tumor volume after SRS [28], others did not [26,29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies reported transient tumor volume increase rates varying between 5-74% among patients treated with SRS [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and a 48% rate among patients treated with FSRT [32]. A recent study showed that transient tumor progression after FRST can occur up to three years and is more frequent in larger tumors (> 3 cm) [33]. Some studies found a correlation between tumor enlargement and initial tumor volume after SRS [28], others did not [26,29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many factors have been analyzed, no statistical association with hearing loss was found. Some studies have associated hearing loss and transient tumor progression [33], other studies did not report a correlation [31]. Predictors of hearing loss after SRS were significant hearing loss before SRS, tumor recurrence and the prescription isodose line, according to a recent study by Wowra et al [51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%