Conventional Theory’s Relevance: Evidence from Japan

Abstract

The formidable surge in the volume of international trade after 1960 stimulated surveys designed to ascertain to what degree the commercial flows among nations reflected the structure of their economies, in other words, how tight was the correlation between international exchanges and the specific attributes of participating nations. In fact, scholars were keen to test the relevance of the conventional Heckscher-Ohlin theory, that is, to what extent did nations’ exports reflect their endowment with factors of production, more specifically, whether their exports used their abundant factors intensively. I try to show that, although most of the tests reached their purpose in that they confirmed the conventional theory’s predictions, in certain cases such as Japan, whose economy is arguably idiosyncratic, factor specificity is more relevant than factor intensity in explaining, not only the country’s international specialization but also the premises of its uncanny 20th century ascendance to the top of the world economy.

Importing Clothing Made from Recycled Textile Materials? A Study of Retailers’ Sourcing Strategies in Five European Countries

“…The distinctive process and characteristics of making clothing using recycled textile materials could impact its production location. Specifically, according to the factor proportion trade theory, countries should specialize in producing goods that intensively use their abundant production factors, such as labor and capital [18]. In general, developing countries abundant with cheap labor are typically involved in making labor-intensive products, whereas developed countries, rich in capital and technology, generally focus on making capital and technology-intensive goods [19,20].…”

La reforma energética y el problema petrolero en México

“…La única manera para poder lograr un precio bajo es que un solo productor satisfaga toda la demanda, aprovechando las economías de escala. La misma teoría convencional (neoclásica) llega a la conclusión de que la creación de grandes empresas públicas en el sector energético, así como sucesivamente en las telecomunicaciones y los sectores donde hay economías de escala, no fue solo el reflejo de la difusión de las ideas keynesianas sobre el papel del Estado en la regulación de una economía de mercado, pues también tenía una clara justificación en la teoría microeconómica (Sorin, 2019).…”