2006
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(06)72431-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional Identification of Streptococcus uberis Isolated from Bovine Mastitis in Argentinean Dairy Herds

Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate a conventional scheme for identifying Streptococcus uberis strains isolated from bovine mastitis. Seventy-five gram-positive, catalase-negative cocci were collected from cows with mastitis from 19 dairy herds located in the east-central region of Argentina. Five American Type Culture Collection strains and bovine isolates were identified by the API 20 Strep system and by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of 16S rDNA. A conventional scheme based on 11 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
28
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
28
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Correct identification is necessary for an efficient therapeutic choice and for also supervising the mastitis control schemes in the herds. A scheme designed by Odierno et al (2006) could biochemically identify typical and atypical S. uberis isolates [30]. Furthermore, this scheme showed a clear correlation with 16S rDNA RFLP for most streptococcal and streptococcal-like species [35].…”
Section: Streptococcus Uberismentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Correct identification is necessary for an efficient therapeutic choice and for also supervising the mastitis control schemes in the herds. A scheme designed by Odierno et al (2006) could biochemically identify typical and atypical S. uberis isolates [30]. Furthermore, this scheme showed a clear correlation with 16S rDNA RFLP for most streptococcal and streptococcal-like species [35].…”
Section: Streptococcus Uberismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Lancefield's classification system is used to classify streptococcal species, although S. uberis is not classifiable by this method because no group of antigens is kept among the strains [28]. Phenotypic identification of S. uberis is determined on conventional protocols such as examination of cultural and morphological characteristics, standard biochemical tests, and enzyme activity [29,30]. In order to confirm identification, molecular assays were designed [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Streptococcus Uberismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, colonies of S. agalactiae, S. dysgalactiae, Enterococcus (E.) saccharolyticus or E. faecalis do not metabolize propylenglycol (red colonies) and do not produce β-galactosidase [13]. S. uberis produces acids out of cellobiose, aesculin, glucose, fructose, galactose, inulin, maltose, mannitol, mannose, ribose, salicin, sorbitol, starch, sucrose and trehalose [9]. Its growth was observed in 4%, but neither in 6.5% NaCl nor at a pH of 9.6.…”
Section: Properties and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some papers indicate that approx. 83% of S. uberis isolates are also aesculin-positive [8,9], while others [10,11] demonstrated that all strains are capable of hydrolysing aesculin. When growing on blood agar plates, S. uberis displays either a weak α-or γ-haemolysis [12].…”
Section: Properties and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation