2017
DOI: 10.24087/iam.2017.1.6.163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional Hemorrhoidectomy with Electrocautery Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Treatment of Haemorrhoids

Abstract: Objective: To compare usage of electrocautery versus stapler in hemorrhoidectomy. Study Design: Randomized control trial. Sampling technique: Non-probability consecutive sample selection. Place and Duration of Study: Department of Surgery (surgical unit II) Bahawal Victoria Hospital Bahawalpur Pakistan, in 6months (from July 2014 to January 2015). Methodology: A total of 124 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria undergoing procedures for hemorrhoids were randomly divided into group 'A' and 'B' treated by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study analyzed factors such as age groups (15-25, 26-35, 36-60 years), length of hospital stay (1-2 days, 4-5 days), postoperative pain scale (1+, 3+), and time taken to return to regular employment (4-5 days, 12-16 days). Statistical analysis was conducted using ttests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables, with a significance threshold set at p<0.05 (18,19). Ethical approval was obtained from the committee, ensuring patient confidentiality and adherence to ethical standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study analyzed factors such as age groups (15-25, 26-35, 36-60 years), length of hospital stay (1-2 days, 4-5 days), postoperative pain scale (1+, 3+), and time taken to return to regular employment (4-5 days, 12-16 days). Statistical analysis was conducted using ttests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables, with a significance threshold set at p<0.05 (18,19). Ethical approval was obtained from the committee, ensuring patient confidentiality and adherence to ethical standards.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%