2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.111131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional diatom testing using strong acid: Notable false-positive results caused by an underestimated contamination source (blind spot)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The diatom test has long been a controversial technique in forensic drowning diagnosis, most prominently due to its sensitivity to contamination and risk of incorrect results even in qualitative analysis [5,[9][10][11][12]. In recent years, an increasing interest of quantitative diatom testing has promoted re-evaluation of the approach [4,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diatom test has long been a controversial technique in forensic drowning diagnosis, most prominently due to its sensitivity to contamination and risk of incorrect results even in qualitative analysis [5,[9][10][11][12]. In recent years, an increasing interest of quantitative diatom testing has promoted re-evaluation of the approach [4,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%