2022
DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional and Investigational Approaches Leveraging Clinical EEG for Prognosis in Acute Disorders of Consciousness

Abstract: Prediction of recovery of consciousness after severe brain injury is difficult and limited by a lack of reliable, standardized biomarkers. Multiple approaches for analysis of clinical electroencephalography (EEG) that shed light on prognosis in acute severe brain injury have emerged in recent years. These approaches fall into two major categories: conventional characterization of EEG background and quantitative measurement of resting state or stimulus-induced EEG activity. Additionally, a small number of studi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
(158 reference statements)
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The visual analysis of clinical standard EEG demonstrated a diffuse slowing of the background activity with high‐amplitude frontally dominant slow‐waves (>75 μV) without a reproducible reactivity to stimuli (Figure 3, upper left panel). In accordance with recent review and specific recommendations (Curley et al, 2022), these findings were interpreted as a severely abnormal EEG, a pattern more often found in VS/UWS patients and not suggestive of covert consciousness (Curley et al, 2018; Forgacs et al, 2014). The severity of EEG slowing was confirmed by the quantification of Delta‐Alpha Ratio spectral power (Bai et al, 2021; Leon‐Carrion et al, 2008; Wutzl et al, 2021) showing values above the 95th percentiles of the distribution previously obtained in a reference population of 40 patients with a minimally conscious state (MCS) (Figure 3, upper right panel).…”
Section: Description Of Clinical and Multimodal Paraclinical Assessmentssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The visual analysis of clinical standard EEG demonstrated a diffuse slowing of the background activity with high‐amplitude frontally dominant slow‐waves (>75 μV) without a reproducible reactivity to stimuli (Figure 3, upper left panel). In accordance with recent review and specific recommendations (Curley et al, 2022), these findings were interpreted as a severely abnormal EEG, a pattern more often found in VS/UWS patients and not suggestive of covert consciousness (Curley et al, 2018; Forgacs et al, 2014). The severity of EEG slowing was confirmed by the quantification of Delta‐Alpha Ratio spectral power (Bai et al, 2021; Leon‐Carrion et al, 2008; Wutzl et al, 2021) showing values above the 95th percentiles of the distribution previously obtained in a reference population of 40 patients with a minimally conscious state (MCS) (Figure 3, upper right panel).…”
Section: Description Of Clinical and Multimodal Paraclinical Assessmentssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The visual analysis of clinical standard EEG demonstrated a diffuse slowing of the background activity with high-amplitude frontally-dominant slow-waves (>75μV) and sporadic lateralized epileptiform discharges on the left parietal sites, without a reproducible reactivity to exogenous stimuli (Figure 3, upper left panel). In accordance with recent review and specific recommendations (Curley et al , 2022), these findings were interpreted as a severely abnormal EEG, a pattern more often found in VS/UWS patients and not suggestive of covert consciousness (Forgacset al , 2014;Curley et al , 2018). The severity of EEG slowing was confirmed by the quantification of Delta-Alpha Ratio (DAR) spectral power (Leon-Carrion et al , 2008;Bai et al , 2021;Wutzl et al , 2021) showing values above the 95th percentiles of the distribution previously obtained in a reference population of 40 patients with a minimally conscious state (MCS) (Figure 3, upper right panel).…”
Section: Resting Eeg Shows a Severe Background Disorganizationsupporting
confidence: 61%