2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.11.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conventional and alternative preimplantation ECG screening for subcutaneous ICD in high risk hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…102 Screening for S-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator fails in 14 to 38% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients due to higher risk of T-wave sensing which may improve by alternative placement of the screening electrodes. 103 S-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients appears effective in the recognition and termination of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation even in the presence of extreme left ventricular hypertrophy. 104,105 Cardiac pacing and thereby antitachycardia pacing is impossible in S-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator which can be a disadvantage for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia as presenting rhythm.…”
Section: Device and Lead Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…102 Screening for S-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator fails in 14 to 38% of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients due to higher risk of T-wave sensing which may improve by alternative placement of the screening electrodes. 103 S-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients appears effective in the recognition and termination of ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation even in the presence of extreme left ventricular hypertrophy. 104,105 Cardiac pacing and thereby antitachycardia pacing is impossible in S-implantable cardioverter-defibrillator which can be a disadvantage for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia as presenting rhythm.…”
Section: Device and Lead Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We encountered preoperatively difficulties in obtaining proper sensing vectors in patients with HCMP, probably due to oversensed high-voltage T, wide and fragmented QRS. The solution was the right parasternal lead position and dorsal device position behind the mid-axillary line [15]. Another point is a large device size: Emblem™ A219: volume 59.5 ml, and size 83.1 × 69.1 × 12.7 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECG screening was repeated for the S-ICD pulse generator placed more dorsally and the lead in RPP and one vector was deemed acceptable [50] . Based on that case, the same study group described that the alternative placement of screening surface electrodes (precordial electrodes shifted to rightwards and lateral electrode dorsally) could be a valuable method to increase eligibility for the S-ICD in these patients, consequently implanting the S-ICD system according to the alternative screening landmarks [51] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%