Convective mass transfer from a submerged drop in a thin falling film

Abstract

We investigate the fluid mechanics of removing a passive tracer contained in small, thin, viscous drops attached to a flat inclined substrate using thin gravity-driven film flows. We focus on the case where the drop cannot be detached either partially or completely from the surface by the mechanical forces exerted by the cleaning fluid on the drop surface. Instead, a convective mass transfer establishes across the drop-film interface and the dilute passive tracer dispersed in the drop diffuses into the film flow, which then transports them away. The Péclet number for the passive tracer in the film phase is very high, whereas the Péclet number in the drop phase varies from Pe d ≈ 10 −2 to 1. The characteristic transport time in the drop is much larger than in the film. We model the mass transfer of the passive tracer from the bulk of the drop phase into the film phase using an empirical model based on an analogy with Newton's law of cooling. This simple empirical model is supported by a theoretical model solving the quasi-steady two-dimensional advection-diffusion equation in the film coupled with a time-dependent one-dimensional diffusion equation in the drop. We find excellent agreement between our experimental data and the two models, which predict an exponential decrease in time of the tracer concentration in the drop. The results are valid for all drop and film Péclet numbers studied. The overall transport characteristic time is related to the drop diffusion time scale, as diffusion within the drop is the limiting process. This result remains valid even for Pe d ≈ 1. Finally, our theoretical model predicts the well-known relationship between the Sherwood number and the Reynolds number in the case of a well-mixed drop Sh ∝ ReL 1/3 = (γL 2 /ν f ), based on the drop length L, film shear rate γ and film kinematic viscosity ν f . We show that this relationship is mathematically equivalent to a more physically intuitive relationship Sh ∝ Re δ , based on the diffusive boundary layer thickness δ. The model also predicts a correction in the case of a non-uniform drop concentration. The correction depends on Re δ , the film Schmidt number, the drop aspect ratio and the diffusivity ratio between the two phases. This prediction is in remarkable agreement with experimental data at low drop Péclet number. It continues to agree as Pe d approaches 1, although the influence of the Reynolds number increases such that Sh ∝ Re δ .

A theory for the slip and drag of superhydrophobic surfaces with surfactant

“…(ii) Second, for u I negligible and γ Ma ∼ 1, U δ depends only on the ratio of the thickness of the diffusive boundary layer and the channel height: U δ ∼ δγ Ma = δ for δ < 1. This regime is also known as the Lévêque regime (Lévêque 1928;Landel et al 2016). Note that V δ ∼ 0 in this case.…”

“…for any g > 0, and with δ 0,3 and δ 1,3 two empirical parameters which need to be determined. This corresponds to the Lévêque regime (Lévêque 1928;Landel et al 2016), giving a power law δ ∼ Pe −1/3 at large Péclet numbers owing to a linear shear rate profile in the diffusive boundary layer. The scalings (3.20)-(3.22) assume that: (i) the variation of the bulk concentration along the interface is sufficiently smooth; (ii) the boundary layer is not confined vertically, i.e.…”

Three-dimensional advective–diffusive boundary layers in open channels with parallel and inclined walls

“…Since our problem is inherently three-dimensional near the corners at |z| = 1/2 for both the velocity and concentration fields, we choose to compute the small correction to the flux due to the wall boundary layers using three-dimensional numerical calculations of the governing equations.We will discuss this further in §5.4. We define the dimensionless flux per unit area as (Landel et al 2016)…”

“…The arrows at the left-hand end of the sketch show the three-dimensional profile of the velocity field and the enlargement of the section just beyond the start of the source of scalar shows the three-dimensional structure of the developing scalar boundary layer. A real-life example would be the mass transfer from a flat viscous contaminant droplet trapped in a gap or crack (Landel et al 2016).…”

Nonlinear transmission conditions for thin curvilinear low-conductive interphases

“…The transmission conditions derived in this paper can be used for modelling heat transfer or mass transfer in a thin layer [15]. In the setting of mass transfer, transmission conditions can be used by analogy once one replaces Fourier's law with first Fick's law and heat equation with second Fick's law.…”