2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convective boiling heat transfer characteristics of CO2 in microchannels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
33
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(24 reference statements)
7
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with conventional channels, evaporation in small channels may provide a higher heat transfer coefficient due to their higher contact area per unit volume of fluid. In evaporation within small channels, as reported by Bao et al (2000), Zhang et al (2004), Kandlikare-Steinke (2003), Tran et al (2000), Pettersen (2004), Park and Hrnjak (2007), Zhao et al [7], Yun et al (2005), Yoon et al (2004), Pamitran et al (2008), and K.-I. Choi (2009), the contribution of nucleate boiling is predominant and laminar flow appears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Compared with conventional channels, evaporation in small channels may provide a higher heat transfer coefficient due to their higher contact area per unit volume of fluid. In evaporation within small channels, as reported by Bao et al (2000), Zhang et al (2004), Kandlikare-Steinke (2003), Tran et al (2000), Pettersen (2004), Park and Hrnjak (2007), Zhao et al [7], Yun et al (2005), Yoon et al (2004), Pamitran et al (2008), and K.-I. Choi (2009), the contribution of nucleate boiling is predominant and laminar flow appears.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It can be seen that heat transfer coefficient increases from 3 to 8 kW/m 2 K for vapor qualities from 0.2 to 0.8 according to Kim et al [20] while for Bang and Choo [19] heat transfer coefficient presents an almost constant value of 2 kW/m 2 K. Figure 4(b) shows the comparison between the data of Yun et al [22] and Pamitran and Choi [21] for R410A flow boiling in microchannels, revealing remarkable discrepancies. According to Yun et al [22], heat transfer coefficient increases with x until a vapour quality of 0.8 while for Pamitran and Choi [21] heat transfer coefficient is almost constant until vapour qualities of 0.4 and then decreases monotonically with vapour quality. Furthermore, at x = 0.4, Tsat = 10 o C and q = 15 kW/m 2 , Yun et alobtained heat transfer coefficients nearly 3 times those obtained by Pamitran and Choi and up to 10 times at larger vapour quality.…”
Section: Fundamental Issues On Microchannel Flow Boilingmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This may be caused by the channel size, working fluids, heat methods or measurement accuracy etc. Just to show two examples here, Figure 15 shows comparison of the experimental data of flow boiling heat transfer coefficient with CO 2 by Yun et al [100] No explanation why there is such a big difference even was offered in their paper. Figure 16 shows the comparison of the CO 2 flow boiling heat transfer coefficients of Pettersen [101] Harirchian and Garimella [65] conducted experiments of flow boiling with FC-77 in multiple rectangular microscale channel heat sinks.…”
Section: Fundamental Issues Of Flow Boiling Heat Transfer In Microscamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29(b) Comparison of the whole R234fa heat transfer coefficient data to the flow pattern based heat transfer model combining the three zone heat transfer model [87] with the unified annular flow heat transfer model [106,107]. [54] and Yun et al [68] illustrated by Ribatski et al in their review paper [7]. [116].…”
Section: Unstable and Transient Flow Boiling Heat Transfer In Microscmentioning
confidence: 99%