1968
DOI: 10.2514/3.4786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convective and radiative heat transfer to an ablating body.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A comparison of the radiative flux at the wall predicted by various researchers is shown in Figure 10 for various ablation rates. For the radiation calculation, Gupta et al 10 and Sutton 75 applied the RAD/EQUIL code 76 , Moss 9 applied the LRAD-3 code 77 , and Garrett et al 6 applied the RATRAP code 1 . The results of the various studies, including the present study, agree within about 10% for the entire range of ablation rates.…”
Section: Mars-return Benchmark Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A comparison of the radiative flux at the wall predicted by various researchers is shown in Figure 10 for various ablation rates. For the radiation calculation, Gupta et al 10 and Sutton 75 applied the RAD/EQUIL code 76 , Moss 9 applied the LRAD-3 code 77 , and Garrett et al 6 applied the RATRAP code 1 . The results of the various studies, including the present study, agree within about 10% for the entire range of ablation rates.…”
Section: Mars-return Benchmark Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research in the late 1960s 1,2,3 and early 1970s 4,5,6,7,8,9 , which was based mostly on equilibrium viscous shock layer flowfield models and 1960s era radiation data, showed a radiation decrease of roughly 30% with m-dot values of 0.05 for conditions relevant to Mars return (15.24 km/s at 60.96 km). A later analysis by Gupta et al 10 confirmed these results with an updated flowfield model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Degeneracy of electronic state i h w Enthalpy of gas at wall (J/kg) H Gas enthalpy (J/mol) I (0-6 eV) Wall-directed radiative intensity spectrally-integrated between 0 and 6 eV (W/cm 2 /sr) J (0-6 eV) Spectrally-integrated emission between 0 and 6 eV (W/cm 3 Frequency-dependent wall-directed radiative flux without radiation-flowfield coupling(W/cm 2 ) R Universal gas constant (J/mol/K) T Temperature (K) U Free-stream velocity for flight case or moving shock speed for shock tube case (km/s) x Curve fit variable, U (km/s) for shock tube cases and T (K) for constricted arc cases z Radial distance normal to the free-stream (cm) Part I…”
Section: Nomenclature a Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stagnation line viscous shock layer solutions with coupled radiation only 2 and coupled radiation and ablation [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] were performed with various levels of fidelity in the flowfield and radiation models. These studies confirm the significant influence of coupled radiation and ablation on the radiative heating for a Mars-return case.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive research on the topic was conducted in the late sixties [6,35,70,83,209] and early seventies [42,47,49,48,55,124,128,188]. These early efforts were motivated by a certain number of upcoming deep space exploration missions, including Apollo, Pioneer Venus Multiprobe (1978), and Galileo (launched in 1989).…”
Section: Radiative Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%