1980
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0248(80)90056-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convective and interfacial instabilities during unidirectional solidification of a binary alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

4
106
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 281 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
106
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22,23,24] In to 44.0 m/s. contrast, in the Al-Cu system, the rejected solute at the Different velocities were examined for each alloy system, interface is heavier and will give rise to a negative density as shown in Table I, and these velocities were selected to gradient in the liquid at the interface, which will result in obtain both cellular and dendritic arrays and to examine the no fluid motion in the absence of other destabilizing forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22,23,24] In to 44.0 m/s. contrast, in the Al-Cu system, the rejected solute at the Different velocities were examined for each alloy system, interface is heavier and will give rise to a negative density as shown in Table I, and these velocities were selected to gradient in the liquid at the interface, which will result in obtain both cellular and dendritic arrays and to examine the no fluid motion in the absence of other destabilizing forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of buoyancy-driven convective instability competing with morphological instability is discussed e.g. in [4), [12), [13), [18) or in [5). Unstable (stable) density stratifications are possible due to solutal expansion if the lighter (heavier) component is rejected.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1982), Hurle & Jakeman ( 1981), Marshall ( 1981)) fundamental uncertainties exist in the prediction of the progress and the shape of the freezing or melting front. The growth of crystals from binary solutions is a process where the interaction of adverse temperature and concentration gradients may generate unwanted interfacial instabilities during a unidirectional solidification (Mullins & Sekerka ( 1964), Coriell et al( 1980), Coriell and Sekerka ( 1982), Hurle & Jakeman (1983)). These instabilities generally deform the i ni tially planar sol id-1 iquid i nterface a nd 1 ead to a c ell ular pattern of micro-segregation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%