2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-012-1102-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Convection-dominated melting of phase change material in partially heated cavity: lattice Boltzmann study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods based on the Lattice Boltzmann equations (LBE) have recently evolved as an approach to direct solutions of the macroscopic equations in porous media [15][16][17][18], nanofluid [19], phase change [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], shock tube problem [36], droplet formation [37,38], turbulent natural convection [39] and so on [40][41][42]. Due to its particulate nature, the LBM has some benefits over the conventional Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques such as handling complex boundaries and physical phenomena, the straightforward implementation on parallel machines, the incorporation of microscopic interactions and high speed of solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on the Lattice Boltzmann equations (LBE) have recently evolved as an approach to direct solutions of the macroscopic equations in porous media [15][16][17][18], nanofluid [19], phase change [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35], shock tube problem [36], droplet formation [37,38], turbulent natural convection [39] and so on [40][41][42]. Due to its particulate nature, the LBM has some benefits over the conventional Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) techniques such as handling complex boundaries and physical phenomena, the straightforward implementation on parallel machines, the incorporation of microscopic interactions and high speed of solving.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for an LBM implementation, one can refer to the works of Miller et al [27], Semma et al [28] and, recently, Su and Davidson [29]. Note that our scheme is close to the bounce-back approach proposed by Huber et al [15] and recently used by Jourabian et al [16] to define the solid regime; however, our enhancement is to adopt a partial bounce-back approach rather than a full bounce-back. Hence, to check out our model, we resumed the convection melting problem handled in these references, keeping the same settings (see Table 1).…”
Section: Comparison With Similar Lbm Schemesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The current model has been implemented to carry out the 2D natural convection and the melting with natural convection. The obtained results have been compared with selected models that have adopted the same LBM scheme: Huber et al [15] and Jourabian et al [16].…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first study on PCM was presented by Barkmann and Wessling [2] for use in buildings, and later by other researchers [3][4][5]. There is a large number of experimental and numerical works on melting and solidification of PCM [6][7][8][9][10], and also its usage as thermal management in building [11][12][13][14], electronic devices [15][16] and solar energy [17][18][19][20].Most investigated geometries in melting and freezing process are sphere (spherical capsule), cylinder (shell and tube heat exchanger) and rectangular enclosure. Khodadadi and Zhang [21] studied the effect of buoyancy-driven convection on constrained melting of PCM in a spherical container numerically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%