2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.09.033506
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ConvDip: A convolutional neural network for better EEG Source Imaging

Abstract: EEG and MEG are well-established non-invasive methods in neuroscientific research and clinical diagnostics. Both methods provide a high temporal but low spatial resolution of brain activity. In order to gain insight about the spatial dynamics of the M/EEG one has to solve the inverse problem, which means that more than one configuration of neural sources can evoke one and the same distribution of EEG activity on the scalp. Artificial neural networks have been previously used successfully to find either one or … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This architecture is able to model the spatio-temporal information provided by training the network to perceive the correlation between the location of the source and the EEG signals without needing a priori constrictions, normally provided manually by more conventional methods. In a similar manner, ConvDip, a convolutional neural network (CNN), has demonstrated a lower normalized mean squared error in ESI solutions compared to that of exact LORETA (eLORETA) and beamformers for a single source, utilizing a shallow CNN with one convolutional layer and two fully connected layers [11]. Compared to the LSTM approach, ConvDip was trained with single time-instances on simulated data but with multiple sources.…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This architecture is able to model the spatio-temporal information provided by training the network to perceive the correlation between the location of the source and the EEG signals without needing a priori constrictions, normally provided manually by more conventional methods. In a similar manner, ConvDip, a convolutional neural network (CNN), has demonstrated a lower normalized mean squared error in ESI solutions compared to that of exact LORETA (eLORETA) and beamformers for a single source, utilizing a shallow CNN with one convolutional layer and two fully connected layers [11]. Compared to the LSTM approach, ConvDip was trained with single time-instances on simulated data but with multiple sources.…”
Section: Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, owing to recent advances which incorporate novel methodologies as well as the introduction of machine learning approaches in solving the inverse problem [10,11], the required time and the computational resources for the solution have been significantly reduced. Furthermore, sophisticated algorithms have diminished the localization error efficiently, estimating the location and activation of the different cortical regions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel class of inverse solvers arose in the past decade that utilize the recent advances in machine learning, predominantly artificial neural networks (ANNs) to solve M/EEG inverse problems. These approaches require training an ANN to produce a source estimate based on simulated pairs of source and M/EEG activity and achieve high accuracy compared to many conventional methods (Cui et al, 2019 ; Hecker et al, 2020 , 2022 ; Pantazis and Adler, 2021 ). ANNs are prone to biases in the training data, wherefore their application is yet limited.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cui et al (2019) [ 33 ] used long-short term memory networks (LSTM) to identify the location and time course of a single source; Ding et. al (2019) [ 34 ] used an LSTM network to refine dynamic statistical parametric mapping solutions; and Hecker et al (2020) [ 35 ] used feedforward neural networks to construct distributed cortical solutions. These studies are limited by the number of dipoles, or aim to address the ill-posed nature of distributed solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%