2009
DOI: 10.1177/0883073808327832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controversies in Neonatal Seizure Management

Abstract: Seizures in the newborn period are common and frequently indicate serious underlying brain injury. Although accumulating evidence suggests that they may impair brain development, there are currently no evidence-based guidelines for evaluation and management of neonatal seizures. In this review, we will address some of the current controversies facing child neurologists and neonatologists, including how to define, monitor, and treat neonatal seizures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
2
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
(131 reference statements)
0
26
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns about the potentially detrimental effects that medications may have on neurodevelopment have persisted in the neonatal neurology community and are echoed by parent respondents to our survey. 8,11,12 Therefore, although it is important to ensure adequate treatment of neonatal seizures to improve long-term developmental outcomes, future research should also focus on the riske benefit ratio of neonatal seizures and their treatments as parents indicated this is an important research priority. Research focusing on this riskebenefit ratio was followed closely by suggestions to find more effective medications, although it is unclear what respondents define as effective because previous research has shown that definitions of effectiveness often differ between families and the medical community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concerns about the potentially detrimental effects that medications may have on neurodevelopment have persisted in the neonatal neurology community and are echoed by parent respondents to our survey. 8,11,12 Therefore, although it is important to ensure adequate treatment of neonatal seizures to improve long-term developmental outcomes, future research should also focus on the riske benefit ratio of neonatal seizures and their treatments as parents indicated this is an important research priority. Research focusing on this riskebenefit ratio was followed closely by suggestions to find more effective medications, although it is unclear what respondents define as effective because previous research has shown that definitions of effectiveness often differ between families and the medical community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Such variation may be related to a lack of evidence to support medication selection or to guide the optimal duration of therapy. 3,8 Importantly, studies of patient or parental opinions of seizure management for older children and adults demonstrate that their goals and priorities do not always match established medical definitions of success. 9 An extensive literature search revealed no published data regarding parental perspectives on neonatal seizures and antiseizure medication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seizures in the neonatal period can be classified into one of three categories, described by Glass et al as “clinical-only,” “electrographic only” and both [6]. “Clinical-only” seizures may be explained by non-epileptic phenomena such as sleep myoclonus, jitteriness from hypocalcemia or hypoglycemia, neonatal abstinence syndrome and breathing-holding spells [2].…”
Section: Seizures In the Term Infantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Encontramos un aumento del porcentaje de muerte fetal frente a la población de gestantes VIH negativas (5,18,19). De todos los recién nacidos con VIH se encontró un 2,8 % con convulsiones neonatales, datos mayores a los de la población general de embarazadas sin VIH (0,01 %), a nivel mundial (20). No se encontró relación significativa entre los bajos niveles de CD4 y el parto pretérmino, contrario a lo reportado en algunos estudios publicados (21).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified