Abstract:The efficacy of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) has been demonstrated for primary immune deficiency diseases and hematological malignancies such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or multiple myeloma with hypogammaglobulinemia. Clinical development of anti-B cell therapies including a monoclonal antibody, bispecific antibody, or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy which could result in severe hypogammaglobulinemia accelerates the argument of prophylactic use of IgRT. Clinical guidelines for C… Show more
“…4. Immunoglobulin replacement: Data on immunoglobulin replacement in CAR T-cell therapy is extrapolated from patients with hematologic malignancy who receive anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and patients who undergo allogeneic HSCT [96][97][98][99]. Therefore, it is unclear if IVIG replacement alters the overall post-CAR T-cell IgG level or improves survival outcomes [96,100].…”
Section: Antibacterial Prophylaxis: As Risk Of Bacterial Infectionmentioning
CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell becomes a breakthrough therapy providing excellent remission rates and durable disease control for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. However, CAR T-cells have several potential side effects including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicities, cytopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Infection has been increasingly recognized as a complication of CAR T-cell therapy. Several factors predispose CAR T-cell recipients to infection. Fortunately, although studies show a high incidence of infection post-CAR T-cells, most infections are manageable. In contrast to patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant, less is known about post-CAR T-cell immune reconstitution. Therefore, evidence regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies in these patients is more limited. As CAR T-cell therapy becomes the standard treatment for R/R B lymphoid malignancies, we should expect a larger impact of infections in these patients and the need for increased clinical attention. Studies exploring infection and immune reconstitution after CAR T-cell therapy are clinically relevant and will provide us with a better understanding of the dynamics of immune function after CAR T-cell therapy including insights into appropriate strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of infections in these patients. In this review, we describe infections in recipients of CAR T-cells, and discuss risk factors and potential mitigation strategies.
“…4. Immunoglobulin replacement: Data on immunoglobulin replacement in CAR T-cell therapy is extrapolated from patients with hematologic malignancy who receive anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and patients who undergo allogeneic HSCT [96][97][98][99]. Therefore, it is unclear if IVIG replacement alters the overall post-CAR T-cell IgG level or improves survival outcomes [96,100].…”
Section: Antibacterial Prophylaxis: As Risk Of Bacterial Infectionmentioning
CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell becomes a breakthrough therapy providing excellent remission rates and durable disease control for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. However, CAR T-cells have several potential side effects including cytokine release syndrome, neurotoxicities, cytopenia, and hypogammaglobulinemia. Infection has been increasingly recognized as a complication of CAR T-cell therapy. Several factors predispose CAR T-cell recipients to infection. Fortunately, although studies show a high incidence of infection post-CAR T-cells, most infections are manageable. In contrast to patients who undergo hematopoietic stem cell transplant, less is known about post-CAR T-cell immune reconstitution. Therefore, evidence regarding antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies in these patients is more limited. As CAR T-cell therapy becomes the standard treatment for R/R B lymphoid malignancies, we should expect a larger impact of infections in these patients and the need for increased clinical attention. Studies exploring infection and immune reconstitution after CAR T-cell therapy are clinically relevant and will provide us with a better understanding of the dynamics of immune function after CAR T-cell therapy including insights into appropriate strategies for prophylaxis and treatment of infections in these patients. In this review, we describe infections in recipients of CAR T-cells, and discuss risk factors and potential mitigation strategies.
“…Data on ScIgRT in the field of allo-HCT are limited, as reviewed previously. 15 In a recent small study, ScIg was administered to allo-HCT patients for up to 6 months, with no statistically significant benefit in clinical outcomes but an advantage in terms of patient satisfaction and healthcare costs. 21 The small number of patients and short duration of intervention in that pilot study may have been insufficient to assess the incidence and severity of infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] However, it is not well established whether hypogammaglobulinaemia in allo-HCT recipients affects clinical outcomes, including the incidence of infectious diseases. 15 One prospective RCT revealed the marked utility of IgRT in allo-HCT. 16 Although other studies also assessed the beneficial impact of IgRT after allo-HCT, meta-analyses showed no consistent benefit to using IgRT after allo-HCT.…”
Section: O R I G I N a L P A P E Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is still controversy regarding IgRT after allo-HCT, although several guidelines, including those of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), recommend its use in patients with hypogammaglobulinaemia who have a history of infectious disease after allo-HCT. 15 In clinical practice, IgRT is currently used in allo-HCT patients at the discretion of the institution or attending physician according to their IgG level and history of infectious disease. Subcutaneous IgRT (ScIgRT) is an option that is commonly used in the field of PID.…”
Section: O R I G I N a L P A P E Rmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated the clear clinical benefit of immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) in SID associated with CLL and MM 11–14 . However, it is not well established whether hypogammaglobulinaemia in allo‐HCT recipients affects clinical outcomes, including the incidence of infectious diseases 15 . One prospective RCT revealed the marked utility of IgRT in allo‐HCT 16 .…”
SummaryImmunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) reduces the risk of infection in hypogammaglobulinaemia secondary to chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and multiple myeloma. However, the benefit of IgRT, especially subcutaneous IgRT (ScIgRT), has not been assessed in hypogammaglobulinaemia after allogeneic haematopoietic cell transplantation (allo‐HCT). We performed a pre–post comparison of the clinical impact of ScIgRT after allo‐HCT in a retrospective analysis of 209 patients who underwent allogeneic HCT at our institution from 2011 to 2019. Since ScIgRT became available at our institution in April 2017, we categorized patients treated from January 2011 to March 2017 as the Pre‐ScIgRT group (n = 118) and those treated from April 2017 to December 2019 as the Post‐ScIgRT group (n = 91). The 2‐year overall survival rate was 65% in the Pre‐ScIgRT group and 81% in the Post‐ScIgRT group (p = 0.02). The cumulative incidence (CI) of non‐relapse mortality at 2 years was 18% and 7% (p = 0.02). There were 78 infectious events in 44 patients in the Pre‐ScIgRT group and 28 such events in 19 patients in the Post‐ScIgRT group. The CI of the documented infection during the observation period was between 38% and 21% (p = 0.01). Our study suggests that ScIgRT may reduce infection rates and improve prognosis after allo‐HCT.
BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor T (CAR‐T) cell therapy has emerged as a potent treatment for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, demonstrating significant clinical efficacy. Despite these advances, treatment‐related toxicities, particularly infections, pose a significant challenge to patient safety.MethodsThis review synthesizes current knowledge on the mechanisms underlying post‐CAR‐T therapy infections, focusing on the interplay between immune dysfunction, host factors, and treatment‐induced toxicity. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the temporal and individual variability in infection characteristics and the confounding clinical presentation of cytokine release syndrome.ResultsThe review identifies that patients receiving CAR‐T cells are at increased risk of concurrent infections due to the heterogeneity in infection characteristics across different time periods, individuals, and patient groups. It highlights the diagnostic and therapeutic complexities introduced by the overlapping symptoms of infection and cytokine release syndrome.ConclusionTo enhance the infection control post‐CAR‐T therapy, this review proposes preventive strategies tailored to the early and long‐term management of patients. It underscores the need for a nuanced understanding of infection mechanisms and the importance of personalized prevention plans to improve clinical outcomes in multiple myeloma treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.