Controversial identities of medicinal plants in classical literature of Ayurveda

Abstract

India's medical heritage across its two streams of experiential knowledge viz. the classical (codified) and folk (oral) reveals an incredible range and depth of knowledge of medicinal plants. In the classical stream of Ayurveda, across the period from 1500 BCE to 1900 CE, there is information of more than 12,000 distinct Sanskrit plant names with overlaps across texts. This information is captured in more than 200 texts viz. 6 samhitas , 57 nighantus and 140 vyakhyas . The information about plants has three major dimensions in codified literature viz. morphological description ( rupa gnana ), pharmacology ( dravya guna shastra ) and pharmacy ( bhaishajya kalpana ). The morphological information is however sketchy and wholly inadequate for establishing botanical identity. Thus despite the huge corpus of plant names backed by sophisticated understanding of pharmacology and pharmacy there is the fact of controversial identities of medicinal plants. Why is this the case? The author believes that the gap in morphological detailing is due to the ‘experiential’ pedagogy of India's health tradition. While knowledge transmission of plants included theoretical propositions and sophisticated logic related to pharmacology, it also assumed an oral, practical and experiential system of learning about the identity of plants through field work. The purpose of this research is to understand the range and depth at which we have understood the problem of controversial identities of medicinal plants, to analyze work done in the field and to propose a Trans disciplinary approach to solve the problem of controversial identities of medicinal plants in Ayurveda.

A Review on Phytopharmacology of Medicinal Plant: Euphorbia Milii Des Moul

“…The underlying source of information is the Samhitas about therapeutic herbs chronologically. Amid these, the Charaka Samhita (1000 BCE-200 CE) and Susruta Samhita (1500 BCE-1000 BCE) are the first to characterise several plant species and their medical properties 16 . The Charaka Samhita, a backbone of Ayurveda, lists an unpleasant reaction to medications that occur whenever they are improperly made or utilised.…”

Micromorphology, Physiognomies and Bio-element Analysis of Launaea nudicaulis (L.) Hook. f.

“…A scientific review suggests that 30% plants mentioned in Ayurveda have controversial identity and Gojihva is one among them. [1] In recent researches various source plants have been used as Gojihva particularly Launaea species like pinattifeda, procumbens, and nudicaulis of Asteraceae family. [2,3] Asteraceae family is one of the largest flowering family which includes 25000 plant species.…”

Comparative Morpho-micrometric Investigations in Six Indigenous Ocimum Species of India with DOE Based HPTLC Method for Multi-class Component Analysis

“…Although Tulasi has a constant historical use in traditional medicine 21 , the genus is prone to intra- and inter-specific misidentification due to ambiguity in its nomenclature and possible polyploidy and hybridizations. This has led to close morphological similarity among the species.…”