Controversial Cartoons in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Abstract

This article analyzes the controversies triggered by sixteen cartoons about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, published in nine western countries between 2001 and 2014. For this, we use E.D. Hirsch’s distinction between the meaning of a text—which refers to the author’s intentions—and its significance—which emphasizes the contexts of production and reception. Critics focused mostly on significance, defenders on meaning. Using this distinction, we first examine the rhetoric of cartoons: stereotypes linked to antisemitism (accusations of deicide and blood libel), use of the Star of David as metonym of Israel, disputed historical analogies (between Israeli policy and Nazism or Apartheid). Second, we analyze four levels of contextual interpretations that have framed the debates: the cartoon as genre, the ethotic arguments about the cartoonist and/or newspaper’s track record, the cartoons’ historical and transnational intertextuality (especially with the Arab press), and the issue of audiences’ sensitivities. We analyze the complex exchanges of arguments that led mostly to a dialogue of the deaf, but also, in some cases, to partial agreement on the offensive character of the cartoons. We conclude that this methodology can be applied to other controversies around popular political texts, which offer similar characteristics.

Humour, empathic concern and perspective‐taking in children. Cartooning about social inequality

“…Stereotypes are also useful and frequent resources among cartoonists. As stated by Shelton Caswell (2004), they are 'visual shortcuts understood by readers' since they enable the representation of abstract ideas in a simple and compact way (Bourdon & Boudana, 2016). Stereotypes are characterised by their relatively fixed and rigid nature and by their durable and extended anchoring in a society (Dufays, 2001).…”

Migration Depicted in Cartoons

“…6 Viewing cartoons as a crucial element in the Middle Eastern crisis, Joel Kotek cautioned against the use of cartoons in Arab and Western media to propagate anti-Jewish sentiments. 7 The extensive histories of Anglo-Irish relations have been thoroughly explored through cartoons in publications such as Punch, the Irish World, the Daily Telegraph, Le Charivari, and the Irish News by various cartoonists. 8 The tensions between India and Pakistan have been depicted through prevalent cartoon themes, revealing the positions of major newspapers in both countries.…”