2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2012.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls, service type and perceived supplier performance in interfirm service exchanges

Abstract: a b s t r a c tControl offers a critical differentiator between successful and failed interfirm service exchanges. The application of informal control to improve supplier performance has been well established, but the effect of formal control appears profoundly equivocal. This study proposes that the actual effect of formal control depends on its mode (output vs. behavior) and its relationship with the service type (mass vs. professional) and informal control. With survey data from 252 service buying organizat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
100
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
2
100
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…A questionnaire was used as the data collection method, the design of which was based on a comprehensive literature review in the field of TQM. The initial version of the questionnaire was revised based on the recommendations of academics and experts in the field (Stouthuysen, Slabbinck, & Roodhooft, 2012). Furthermore, based on a pilot study, the questionnaire items were improved and modified in terms of clarity (Stouthuysen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A questionnaire was used as the data collection method, the design of which was based on a comprehensive literature review in the field of TQM. The initial version of the questionnaire was revised based on the recommendations of academics and experts in the field (Stouthuysen, Slabbinck, & Roodhooft, 2012). Furthermore, based on a pilot study, the questionnaire items were improved and modified in terms of clarity (Stouthuysen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Questionnaire Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As condições para atingir vantagem competitiva (DYER;SINGH, 1998;FLYNN;HUO;ZHAO, 2010) e que os mecanismos de socialização podem favorecer esse desempenho superior (CARR; PEARSON, 1999;ANDERSEN;BUVIK, 2001;BECHTEL, 2001;LAWSON et al, 2009, CAREY et al, 2011STOUTHUYSEN;SLABBINCK;ROODHOOFT, 2012 (BOURDIER, 1980;COLEMAN, 1988 (OLIVER, 1990). Nesse processo interativo, novos laços podem ser estabelecidos de forma mais dinâmica (GULATI; GARGIULO, 1999).…”
Section: O Relacionamento Interorganizacionalunclassified
“…Dessa forma, a literatura sinaliza que os mecanismos formais e informais podem compor um conjunto de recursos relacionais (capital relacional) que, quando acessado, pode proporcionar um impacto significativo nos retornos e no desempenho dos fornecedores HUGHES;PERROW, 2011;STOUTHUYSEN;SLABBINCK;ROODHOOFT, 2012).…”
Section: Implicações Dos Relacionamentos Interorganizacionais Para a unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It will mostly depend on the capability of firms within the supply chain and the products/services to dynamically add value internally or externally to adapt to customer demand and to enhance customers' perceptions and satisfaction. As such, it is believed that firms are more profitable, efficient and effective when they concentrate on their core activities and let the rest be taken care of by specialist providers, who are able to maximize value and minimize costs and disruption thereby ensuring success for clients [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%