2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228716
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controls of subducting slab dip and age on the extensional versus compressional deformation in the overriding plate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The models presented in the preceding section were run with a constant density difference (Δρ) between the subducting slab and the ambient mantle. However, the negative buoyancy of subducting slabs can vary with the lithospheric age, as reported in Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org the existing literature (Cruciani et al, 2005;Dasgupta et al, 2021a), where the slabs become increasingly denser with age. We thus ran additional simulations to test the possible effects of increasing slab buoyancy on the trench topography by varying Δρ in a non-dimensional form:…”
Section: Discussion Effects Of Slab Buoyancymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The models presented in the preceding section were run with a constant density difference (Δρ) between the subducting slab and the ambient mantle. However, the negative buoyancy of subducting slabs can vary with the lithospheric age, as reported in Frontiers in Earth Science frontiersin.org the existing literature (Cruciani et al, 2005;Dasgupta et al, 2021a), where the slabs become increasingly denser with age. We thus ran additional simulations to test the possible effects of increasing slab buoyancy on the trench topography by varying Δρ in a non-dimensional form:…”
Section: Discussion Effects Of Slab Buoyancymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Many earlier studies have used this CFD code to deal with different geodynamic problems, such as mantle convection (He, 2014), magma upwelling (Shahraki and Schmeling, 2012), Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities (Ruffino et al, 2016), mid-ocean ridge development (Montési and Behn, 2007), wedge melting (Lee and Kim, 2021), and plate subduction (Carminati and Petricca, 2010;Rodriguez-Gonzalez et al, 2012). To track the evolving surface of model surface topography, we implemented an arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) scheme, the detailed mathematical formulation of which can be seen in earlier publications Mandal, 2022 andDasgupta et al,2021a).…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(3) Parameter estimation of ARIMA model. ARIMA(p, d, q) becomes a stationary sequence after d a stationary sequence [36,37], which is equivalent to the ARMA model and only needs to be solved by the method of parameter estimation a p = (φ 1 , φ 2 , . .…”
Section: Solving Steps Of Arimamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present model we have considered a simple steady underthrust geometry, without any slab steepening, break-off, or flattening in the experimental setup. Recent numerical models of Dasgupta et al (2021) allow us to stipulate that unsteady slab-dip (i.e., steepening or flattening) would be an additional factor in determining the contractional versus extensional tectonics of the overriding plate. Thus, this issue opens up a further scope for advancing the present Tibet model with an unsteady slab underthrusting.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Scopesmentioning
confidence: 99%