2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.17.044007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the Spatiotemporal Response of Transient Reverberating Sound

Abstract: Sound propagating inside a room is multiply scattered by the boundaries and other obstacles, forming a complex reverberating sound field (RSF). Such RSFs are not only spatially disordered but also temporally scrambled. Although the spatial control of steady-state RSFs at single frequencies is successfully achieved by extending the idea of wavefront shaping to acoustics, time-coherent polychromatic control of RSFs has remained out of reach. Here, we report spatiotemporal acoustic wavefield shaping by adaptively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed adjustable parallel Helmholtz acoustic metamaterial (abbreviated as the APH-AM) was developed by introducing the multiple resonant chambers and tuning the length of rear cavity for each chamber. It should be noted that the tuning mechanism required manual mechanical intervention and it was not an automatic process, which was quite different from the electronically programmable metasurfaces [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. The sound field minimization through in situ engineered destructive interferences could maximize/minimize the sound field inside a room at a desired point for a static single-frequency [ 30 ], a static multi-frequency or a transient multi-frequency field [ 31 ], which could achieve ultrabroadband absorber in microwave domain [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed adjustable parallel Helmholtz acoustic metamaterial (abbreviated as the APH-AM) was developed by introducing the multiple resonant chambers and tuning the length of rear cavity for each chamber. It should be noted that the tuning mechanism required manual mechanical intervention and it was not an automatic process, which was quite different from the electronically programmable metasurfaces [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. The sound field minimization through in situ engineered destructive interferences could maximize/minimize the sound field inside a room at a desired point for a static single-frequency [ 30 ], a static multi-frequency or a transient multi-frequency field [ 31 ], which could achieve ultrabroadband absorber in microwave domain [ 33 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently the most prominent example are metasurface-programmable smart radio environments, foreseen to play a pivotal role in next-generation wireless networks 1 3 . The same concept also underlies promising implementations of reconfigurable holographic antennas 4 – 6 and wave-based signal processors 7 , 8 in the microwave regime, and emerges in nanophotonics 9 11 , optics 12 – 14 and room acoustics 15 , 16 , too. However, the inverse-design problem of identifying a configuration of the DOFs that yields a desired system transfer function is notoriously difficult for two reasons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In fact, MPCMs emerge yet more generally across scales and wave phenomena as new approach to controlling wave-matter interactions besides the established approaches of metamaterial engineering (i.e., designing the entire system from scratch) and wavefront shaping (i.e., designing the impinging wavefront). Some experiments were already reported in nanophotonics [14,15,16], optics [17,18,19] and room-acoustics [20,21]. Therefore, many of the tools discussed in this chapter may soon play a role not only in next-generation wireless networks but more generally in the broader field of MPCMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To this end, we apply multiple linear regression to the measured data in order to identify the best possible linear model; the accuracy of the latter is an upper bound to the accuracy that could be achieved with the linear cascaded model from Eq. (21). For a given wireless channel 𝐻 𝑖 𝑗 (c), and the corresponding prediction based on the linear model H𝑖 𝑗 (c), we evaluate…”
Section: Non-linearity In the Mapping From Ris Configuration To Channelmentioning
confidence: 99%