Controlling the rainbow lorikeet in Tasmania: is it too late?

Robinson, Susan; Baker, G. Barry; Barclay, Candida

doi:10.1080/01584197.2020.1852574

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous records of establishment in the area indicate that each of these three Psittacines have associated species‐ or location‐specific factors that, along with propagule pressure, are key determiners of successful establishment (Blackburn & Duncan, 2001; Redding et al, 2019). Ring‐necked parakeets, rainbow lorikeets and galahs have all demonstrated the capacity to spread outside their natural range and negatively impact upon multiple environmental and agricultural values (Bomford & Sinclair, 2002; Chapman, 2005; Jackson, 2021; Joseph, 2014; Menchetti & Mori, 2014; Mori & Menchetti, 2021; Robinson et al, 2020; Shiels & Kalodimos, 2019). For these reasons, all three species are listed as pests and are either currently or have the potential to be banned from sale in the Auckland region, along with monk parakeets Myiopsitta monachus , sulphur‐crested cockatoos Cacatua galerita and eastern rosellas Platycercus eximius (Auckland Council, 2020b, 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cumulative propagule pressure exerted by escaped pet parrots

Stanley

McNaughton

Fewster

et al. 2023

Journal of Applied Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cumulative propagule pressure exerted by escaped pet parrots

Stanley

McNaughton

Fewster

et al. 2023

Journal of Applied Ecology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For native species, it is likely that many of these species are being sold outside of their native ranges, potentially in large numbers, which is an unexplored biosecurity risk. For example, the third most abundant native parrot species, the rainbow lorikeet (Trichoglossus haematodus), is native to the eastern coast of Australia, but has established invasive populations in Western Australia and Tasmania due to their popularity in trade (Chapman, 2005;Robinson 2020). With the high number of native species sold, there is potential for another 'domestic non-native' species to establish.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Who’s a pretty bird? Predicting the abundance of bird species in Australian online pet trade

Hill

Delean

Stringham

et al. 2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The exotic pet trade has largely shifted from traditional brick-and-mortar shops to online commerce. Understanding the dynamics of online pet trade, including relationships between species characteristics and a species’ relative popularity, can assist in informing trade regulation for conservation and biosecurity. Here, we identified the leading correlates behind the abundance in the Australian trade of parrot (Psittaciformes) and songbird (Passeriformes) species. We examined 14,000 online sales of parrots and songbirds collected from a popular online Australian marketplace in 2019 (representing 235 species) using an automated data collection method. We identified the characteristics that correlated with online species abundance (i.e., popularity); including (i) breeding and handling requirements; (ii) trade and availability; and (iii) appearance and behaviour. We found 55% of parrot species and 64% of songbird species traded online were non-native to Australia (i.e., alien species), most of which (81% and 85% respectively) have an extreme risk of establishing invasive populations. Species abundance of both orders was influenced by cheaper prices, which is associated with a higher invasion risk. Trade in parrots was also correlated with attractive birdsongs, being easy to care for, and a preference for native Australian species. Songbird abundance was correlated with attractive plumage colour and, to a lesser extent, the availability of colour mutations and smaller range sizes. These results, combined with an understanding of consumer behaviour and international trends, may help predict which species will become popular in domestic trade in the future, and identify current and future invasion risks to assist in environmental biosecurity efforts.

show abstract

“…Both native and non-native animals are traded as exotic pets (Toomes et al, 2022(Toomes et al, , 2023. Although exotic pets may be native within geographic borders, the release of pets outside their native ranges may still result in the establishment of so-called "domestic" invasive species, the introduction of pet-borne pathogens and parasites, and hybridization between non-native and native subspecies (Robinson et al, 2020). Effective mitigation of the invasion and disease risks associated with the exotic pet trade has been undermined by incomplete information on the size, composition, and trade flows associated with the exotic pet trade (Olden et al, 2021;Sinclair et al, 2021;Stringham et al, 2021a); lack of formal documentation to track the pet trade (Marshall et al, 2020); expanding internet-based trade in exotic pets that is generating invasion and disease pathways that are difficult to regulate (Lenda et al, 2014;Olden et al, 2021); lack of comprehensive regional, national, and international policies governing the pet trade (Brown, 2006;Essl et al, 2015;Toomes et al, 2023;Voyles et al, 2015); and poor enforcement of existing policies and regulations (Fonseca et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Identifying inconsistencies in exotic pet regulations that perpetuate trade in risky species

Pratt,

Lockwood,

King

et al. 2023

Conservation Biology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Regulatory inconsistencies at different jurisdictional levels have contributed to the global expansion of the exotic pet trade, with resultant increases in the spread of invasive species and pathogens. Researchers have enumerated multiple limitations and environmental risks posed by international and national rules that govern the exotic pet trade, yet little attention has been focused on regulation of the exotic pet trade within national borders. We reviewed state‐level regulations that apply to the trade of vertebrate animal taxa in the United States (US). Definitions and classifications for regulating different vertebrate taxa varied greatly across states, and the terms ‘pet’ and ‘companion animal’ were poorly defined and inconsistent across states. States implemented regulations that permit trade in exotic vertebrate pets that are banned from import into the US owing to public health and conservation concerns. Once species have been imported into the US, inconsistent internal regulations facilitate movement of animals that pose substantial invasion and disease risks. Violations of state laws were typically listed as misdemeanors, and the median fine for violating state wildlife trade laws was $1,000. Inconsistent and incomplete regulation of exotic vertebrate pets across state borders, in conjunction with limited penalties for violating regulations, has facilitated continued possession of exotic pets in states where these animals are banned. Based on our review of regulatory weaknesses, we conclude that transition to a federally enforced list of vertebrate species that may be traded as pets is needed, with all other vertebrate species banned from the exotic pet trade unless their potential invasion and disease risks have been assessed and demonstrated to be low or nonexistent.Article Impact Statement: Inconsistent and incomplete regulation of the trade in exotic pets in the United States perpetuates invasion and disease risks.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

show abstract

Controlling the rainbow lorikeet in Tasmania: is it too late?

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

Cumulative propagule pressure exerted by escaped pet parrots

Cumulative propagule pressure exerted by escaped pet parrots

Who’s a pretty bird? Predicting the abundance of bird species in Australian online pet trade

Identifying inconsistencies in exotic pet regulations that perpetuate trade in risky species

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About