1995
DOI: 10.1109/51.391775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the movement of a surgical laparoscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They were initially envisioned as endoscope manipulators meant to relieve surgical assistants. Indeed, their first field of application in laparoscopy was manipulation of the imaging system via tracking of surgical tools [57] or surgeon head motion [58].…”
Section: Rigid Dextrous Robots For Mis -2 Nd Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were initially envisioned as endoscope manipulators meant to relieve surgical assistants. Indeed, their first field of application in laparoscopy was manipulation of the imaging system via tracking of surgical tools [57] or surgeon head motion [58].…”
Section: Rigid Dextrous Robots For Mis -2 Nd Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can hold the endoscope steady, and the surgeon can control the system remotely using a computer display. For these reasons, many robotic endoscopic systems have been developed [1,5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a control group, a resident performed the role of the assistant surgeon. As optic positioners, we evaluated the robotic voices-controlled system AESOP 2000 (Computer Motion, Goleta, CA, USA) [11], the robotic helmet-controlled system ENDOASSIST (Armstrong Healthcare, UK) [5], the remoter-controlled system FIPS Endoarm (Nuclear Research Institute, Karlsruhe, Germany) [3], the passive system TISKA Endoarm (Nuclear Research Institute) [12], the Martin Arm (Martin GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany), and the Endofreeze (Aesculap). In all cases, a TISKA Endoarm was used as an instrument holder, except for the last two groups, in which a second Martin arm and a second Tuebingen Ball-Trocar Arm, respectively, were employed.…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%