2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2011.06.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the growth of nanocrystalline silicon by tuning negative substrate bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative estimation of the crystalline volume fraction (X C ) has been performed by the deconvolution of each Raman spectrum into three Gaussian components, the component on the higher frequency side represents the nanocrystalline part of the material and the lower frequency component arises from the amorphous part, whereas the intermediate one corresponds to the ultra-nanocrystalline and/or the grain boundary component. 24 The variation of crystalline volume fraction (X C ) and ultrananocrystalline fraction (X unc ) is shown in Fig. 6(b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative estimation of the crystalline volume fraction (X C ) has been performed by the deconvolution of each Raman spectrum into three Gaussian components, the component on the higher frequency side represents the nanocrystalline part of the material and the lower frequency component arises from the amorphous part, whereas the intermediate one corresponds to the ultra-nanocrystalline and/or the grain boundary component. 24 The variation of crystalline volume fraction (X C ) and ultrananocrystalline fraction (X unc ) is shown in Fig. 6(b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed investigation by the Raman studies on the samples has been shown in a previous publication. 30 The crystallinity in the bulk of the nc-Si:H films obtained from the ellipsometry data and the overall crystallinity estimated from the Raman study has been plotted at the inset (b) in Fig. 2 which indentifies an excellent agreement.…”
Section: A Ellipsometric Studymentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The intermediate phase implying the possible existence of Si QDs, and the films are supposed to be a mixture of various components including amorphous content and c‐Si QDs. Considering the intermediate phase as a part of crystalline component, F c is defined by the integrated area ratio Fnormalc=true(Ia+Iitrue)/(βInormala+Inormali+Inormalc) where I a , I i , and I c represented the integrated area of a‐Si phase peak, intermediate phase peak and c‐Si phase peak, respectively. β is the ratio of the integrated Raman cross‐section of the amorphous phase to crystalline phase and is defined as βtrue(Dtrue)=0.1+normalexp(D/250) where D is the Si QD size in nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%