2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling the dissolution of iron through the development of nanostructured Fe-Mg for biomedical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FFT results presented a number of explicit diffraction points in pairs rather than indefinite halo rings, indicating a typical crystal characterization. 27 The interplanar spacing was obtained by measuring the lattice fringes in different directions. In particular, the γ-austenite plane (111) with a crystal plane spacing of 0.211 nm and the ε-martensite plane (103) with a crystal plane spacing of 0.123 nm were observed in region 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The FFT results presented a number of explicit diffraction points in pairs rather than indefinite halo rings, indicating a typical crystal characterization. 27 The interplanar spacing was obtained by measuring the lattice fringes in different directions. In particular, the γ-austenite plane (111) with a crystal plane spacing of 0.211 nm and the ε-martensite plane (103) with a crystal plane spacing of 0.123 nm were observed in region 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…To further inquire into the lattice structure, two regions in Figure c were selected to process the fast Fourier transform (FFT), filtered FFT, and inverse FFT (Figure d–i). The FFT results presented a number of explicit diffraction points in pairs rather than indefinite halo rings, indicating a typical crystal characterization . The interplanar spacing was obtained by measuring the lattice fringes in different directions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the specific values of hardness and elastic modulus for the PIL were clearly the smallest compared to traditional biomedical implants, PDL [ 60 ] and chitosan [ 61 ] (Figure 4b), whereas the stiffness of the PIL is almost the same as that of human bone. However, the energy‐dissipative properties of traditional biomedical implants with high elastic moduli are prone to degenerate gradually because of their lower energy dissipation, such as Carbon–Ti, [ 62 ] Fe–Mg, [ 63 ] Ti6Al4V, [ 64 ] NiTi, [ 64 ] titanium, Ti–Zr–Nb–Mo, [ 65 ] Ti–Nb–Mg, [ 66 ] Ti–Nb–Zr–Ta, [ 67 ] Ti–24Nb–4Zr, [ 68 ] and Ti–Nb–Zr–Co. [ 68 ] However, owing to the periodontium‐mimetic architecture of the current polymer‐infiltrated amorphous titania‐nanotube‐array, the PIL could simultaneously enhance the osteointegration and energy‐dissipation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biodegradable metals (BMs), represented by magnesium-, zinc-, and iron-based alloys, are expected to degrade or corrode gradually in vivo after performing their supportive assisting functions during tissue healing or disease diagnosis, under the influence of appropriate host responses. Compared with their polymeric counterparts, BMs possess higher mechanical strength and show better performance as cardiovascular stents and bone implants [ [1] , [2] , [3] ]. Several reviews have presented the state-of-the-art technologies in developing BMs-based degradable biomedical implants [ [4] , [5] , [6] , [7] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%