2006
DOI: 10.1002/spe.761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling quality‐of‐service in distributed real‐time and embedded systems via adaptive middleware

Abstract: An increasingly important and challenging problem for distributed real-time and embedded (DRE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several proposals to map QoS into sessions; however they require proprietary modules on the end-systems and ''expert" users to select the most suitable class [23], which reduce the system flexibility. Ruy et al [24] proposed a centralized agent that classifies session requirements into service classes between networks with different QoS models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several proposals to map QoS into sessions; however they require proprietary modules on the end-systems and ''expert" users to select the most suitable class [23], which reduce the system flexibility. Ruy et al [24] proposed a centralized agent that classifies session requirements into service classes between networks with different QoS models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A different QoS mapping solution is introduced by Schantz et al [13] to control the quality level of sessions in DiffServ-aware home networks. Based on the congestion notification sent by resource allocation controllers, receivers may request the mapping of the session into a less important class.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the model is extended with stochastic variables, it is amenable to statistical model checking, a simulation‐based analysis with statistical guarantees, ie, finely controlled quality of results by various confidence parameters. This allows validating quantitative properties derived from requirements relevant to the IoT system's architecture …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%