Ecosystem services are a telling concept to discuss the integrated management of natural resources, 24 such as integrated water and soil, with non-academic stakeholders. Stakeholders have different 25 perceptions regarding the management of various ecosystem services, which is challenging when 26 aiming to develop and foster sustainable ecosystem management. We performed a stakeholder 27 analysis as part of a social-ecological study in preparation of a decision support system for integrated 28 water management within the Lake Manyara sub-basin (LMSB), Tanzania. The area includes a National 29 Park and UNESCO Biosphere Reserve. A group discussion listed 26 stakeholders, categorized according 30 to sector, influence, and interest. The stakeholders were grouped into six functional categories: local 31 Non Governmental Organisations (NGOs), other civil society groups, Belgian and international NGOs, 32 authorities, academics associated to international donors and the private sector. We empirically 33 identified advantages, shortcomings and associated risks when performing a stakeholder analysis with 34 an interest-influence matrix. Confounding factors may include e.g., the omission of important 35 stakeholders, a different understanding influence and interest . 36 and influence 37 Further, we 38 consider stakeholders who directly extract resources from the social-ecological system (SES) as a 39 separate category, because of their direct dependence and impact on the SES. This improved 40 stakeholder analysis framework for developing decision support systems in water basins can 41 contribute to better analysis, understanding and management of aquatic social-ecological systems in 42 general. 43