2009
DOI: 10.4310/mrl.2009.v16.n4.a8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling manifold covers of orbifolds

Abstract: Abstract. In this article we prove a generalization of Selberg's lemma on the existence of torsion free, finite index subgroups of arithmetic groups. Some of the geometric applications are the resolution a conjecture of Nimershiem and answers to questions of Long-Reid and the author.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let Y be one of these non-spinnable orientable flat 4-manifolds. By [12] and the improvement in [14], every flat 4-manifold occurs as some cusp cross-section of a possibly (indeed, likely) multi-cusped arithmetic hyperbolic 5-manifold. Hence Y can be arranged as a cusp cross-section of an arithmetic hyperbolic 5-manifold X. X cannot be spin, since it is well known that a spin structure induces a spin structure on a boundary component (see [11,Chapter II,Proposition 2.15]).…”
Section: Non-spinnable Hyperbolic Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let Y be one of these non-spinnable orientable flat 4-manifolds. By [12] and the improvement in [14], every flat 4-manifold occurs as some cusp cross-section of a possibly (indeed, likely) multi-cusped arithmetic hyperbolic 5-manifold. Hence Y can be arranged as a cusp cross-section of an arithmetic hyperbolic 5-manifold X. X cannot be spin, since it is well known that a spin structure induces a spin structure on a boundary component (see [11,Chapter II,Proposition 2.15]).…”
Section: Non-spinnable Hyperbolic Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Completing the proof of Theorem 1.1 Given Proposition 5.1 and Corollary 4.2, the following result will complete the proof of Theorem 1.1. The proof of Proposition 7.1 is given in a much more general context in [24], however, for completeness we give a proof in §7.1 adapted to the case at hand. Proposition 7.1.…”
Section: Cohomological Goodnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long and Reid showed that any closed flat (n − 1)-manifold N is diffeomorphic to a cusp cross-section of a finite volume hyperbolic n-orbifold M [37]. It was later proved by McReynolds that the same can be achieved with M being a manifold [39]. In both constructions the resulting n-orbifold or manifold can be chosen to be arithmetic.…”
Section: Minimal Volume Manifolds and Cuspsmentioning
confidence: 99%