2008
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21927
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling kinesin motor proteins in nanoengineered systems through a metal‐binding on/off switch

Abstract: A significant challenge in utilizing kinesin biomolecular motors in integrated nanoscale systems is the ability to regulate motor function in vitro. Here we report a versatile mechanism for reversibly controlling the function of kinesin biomolecular motors independent of the fuel supply (ATP). Our approach relied on inhibiting conformational changes in the neck-linker region of kinesin, a process necessary for microtubule transport. We introduced a chemical switch into the neck-linker of kinesin by genetically… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2) compared with the untreated control, which suggests that SHTH-functionalization of the MT surface did not disrupt the motility characteristics of the MTs over the 6-day period. While the velocity of certain treatments were significantly higher than the control, the observed velocities across all treatments and days were within the normal variance for kinesin motors (Coy et al, 1999;Greene et al, 2008;Hess et al, 2004), and likely explained by normal variation within assays (e.g., temperature) and kinesin preparations. Overall, these data are also consistent with negligible effects on velocity based on modification of MTs with small molecules such as biotin (Korten and Diez, 2008).…”
Section: Motility Of Shth-based Ab-mtsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…2) compared with the untreated control, which suggests that SHTH-functionalization of the MT surface did not disrupt the motility characteristics of the MTs over the 6-day period. While the velocity of certain treatments were significantly higher than the control, the observed velocities across all treatments and days were within the normal variance for kinesin motors (Coy et al, 1999;Greene et al, 2008;Hess et al, 2004), and likely explained by normal variation within assays (e.g., temperature) and kinesin preparations. Overall, these data are also consistent with negligible effects on velocity based on modification of MTs with small molecules such as biotin (Korten and Diez, 2008).…”
Section: Motility Of Shth-based Ab-mtsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…CINT has developed the capability for engineering kinesin (and other biomolecular motors) to address issues of both control (e.g., on/off switch) and stability, as well as to incorporate "chemical handles" on motors to enable integration. [44][45][46][47][48] In addition, a number of functionalization schemes to enable the attachment of cargo (e.g., NPs to microtubules) have been achieved and have been used to establish a means of actively assembling nanocomposite structures [49][50][51][52] . [53][54][55][56] For example, Bachand and Paxton used this transport system to actively assemble networks of block copolymer nanotubes.…”
Section: Agmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach to date involves sequestering and releasing ATP to achieve an “on/off” switch (Hess et al 2001; Yokokawa et al 2003; Tucker et al 2008). Greene and coworkers engineered a zinc binding site into conventional kinesin and showed that increasing the zinc concentration inhibited motility (Greene et al 2008). Tomishige and Vale engineered cysteines into the neck linker domain and showed that the motor can be regulated by reversible disulfide linking (Tomishige and Vale 2000).…”
Section: General Features Of Nanoscale Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%