1999
DOI: 10.20955/wp.1999.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling for Heterogeneity in Gravity Models of Trade and Integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Matyas (1997), Matyas et al. (2004), or more recently Cheng and Wall (2005) and Kandogan (2008), the model is estimated by ordinary least squares including country fixed effects. In that sense, in α i refer to destination fixed effects, are origin fixed effects and μ t are year fixed effects.…”
Section: The Effect Of a Common Currency On Trade And Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Matyas (1997), Matyas et al. (2004), or more recently Cheng and Wall (2005) and Kandogan (2008), the model is estimated by ordinary least squares including country fixed effects. In that sense, in α i refer to destination fixed effects, are origin fixed effects and μ t are year fixed effects.…”
Section: The Effect Of a Common Currency On Trade And Tourismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if the decisions to form EIAs are ‘slow‐moving’– as they are likely to be – but trade flows are not slow moving (also likely), then panel data offers an opportunity to better identify unbiased effects of EIAs on trade flows. Bayoumi and Eichengreen (1997) pursued this using first‐differences and Cheng and Wall (2005) using fixed effects, but both in the context of atheoretical gravity specifications with small samples.…”
Section: Estimating the Effects Of Various Eias On Trade Flows Usimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Rose, 2000, 14) Gravity models have provided "some of the clearest and most robust empirical findings in economics." Cheng and Wall (1999) state that the omission of fixed effects may lead to a pattern of over-and under-estimates of trade flows. While the first two are about issues of econometric hygiene (specification) and the third addresses an issue of public policy, all three claim that some omission of variables has important implications for the interpretation of results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%