Ieee Infocom 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2009.5061976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling False Alarm/Discovery Rates in Online Internet Traffic Flow Classification

Abstract: Classifying Internet traffic flows online into applications or broader classes without inspecting the packet payloads or without relying on port numbers has become a necessity for network operators. The operators can use this information to monitor their networks and provide per-class quality of service. There has been a great deal of research done on Internet traffic classification recently and numerous techniques have been proposed. While the current techniques can obtain a high accuracy classifying Internet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [18], the authors present two novel types of online Internet traffic classifiers designed to ensure performance guarantees for false alarm and false discovery rates. These classifiers aim to minimize overall misclassification rates while meeting specific constraints, with one classifier focused on reducing false alarm rates and the other on reducing false discovery rates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], the authors present two novel types of online Internet traffic classifiers designed to ensure performance guarantees for false alarm and false discovery rates. These classifiers aim to minimize overall misclassification rates while meeting specific constraints, with one classifier focused on reducing false alarm rates and the other on reducing false discovery rates.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that FDR is defined as the expectation of a false positive/(false positive + true positive)) [111] and performance evaluation with controlling FDR has been widely used in statistics and genomics. In contrast, while an exception [112] can be found in traffic classification literature, controlling FDR was rarely conducted in malware detection literature. As we can observe in its definition, FDR highly depends on false positives.…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithms and Model Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous works [15][16][17], we applied ML algorithms in flow-based identification for the classification of IM applications, we achieved high promising accuracy results and improved the performance of the utilized ML algorithms. Similarly, several studies in the past [8,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] have also applied ML algorithms for flow-based traffic classification, bandwidth management and security analysis. However, most of them are related to improving the performance of classification using ML algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, due to altering the original class distribution, the sampling methods were criticized. Nechay et al [22] proposed two different novel ML classifiers based on Neyman-Pearson and Learning Satisfiability framework. Chen and Wasikowski [25] pointed out that it is more difficult for solve class imbalance when the dimensionality is very high.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%