2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12195-015-0404-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlling Cell Geometry Affects the Spatial Distribution of Load Across Vinculin

Abstract: The shape of adherent cells is known to be a key determinant of cellular processes such as proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. Manipulation of cell shape affects stem cell differentiation, gene expression, and the response of cells to mechanical stimulation. Shape sensing is at least partially due to mechanically-sensitive signaling within focal adhesions (FAs). Therefore, we evaluate the dependence of cellular force generation on cellular geometry by measuring loads across the FA protein vinculin u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(106 reference statements)
8
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…See Materials and Methods for additional details on this analysis. Comparison of over 400 cells individually characterized using the mean‐, median‐, and mode, both with and without bootstrapping, demonstrates that using the bootstrapped mode results in a population average that most closely matches the estimate from previous work but without the use of user‐defined exclusion criteria (Fig. ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…See Materials and Methods for additional details on this analysis. Comparison of over 400 cells individually characterized using the mean‐, median‐, and mode, both with and without bootstrapping, demonstrates that using the bootstrapped mode results in a population average that most closely matches the estimate from previous work but without the use of user‐defined exclusion criteria (Fig. ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…D). Comparison of these calculations to our previously published cell‐averaged method (mean = 2.25, se = 0.155) demonstrates that the mode‐based estimation provides similar results to our previous approach without the need for user‐defined exclusion criteria used in the previous work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The FRET-force relationship of the sensor was previously calibrated and found to have a dynamic range of 1–5 pN [13]. This sensor module was recently shown to respond to compressive loading, with higher FRET than in the unloaded state [14]. We and others have inserted the sensor into a number of proteins at cell-cell [1518] and cell-matrix [13, 19] adhesions, indicating that the dynamic range of the sensor is well suited to study forces on proteins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%