Controlled Zygapophysial Joint Blocks: The Travesty of Cost-Effectiveness

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to develop equations by which the costs could be compared of various models of performing diagnostic blocks for spinal pain.Design. Algorithms were elaborated describing different strategies for the diagnosis of cervical or lumbar zygapophysial joint pain using placebo-controlled diagnostic blocks, comparative local anaesthetic blocks, or no control blocks, and its treatment with radiofrequency neurotomy. For each step in each algorithm cost functions were applied. Summary equations were derived that allowed the cost of the algorithms to be compared algebraically. A selection of costs were substituted for the unknown variables in the equations in order to illustrate the cost-effectiveness of different algorithms under Australian and US conditions.Results. The equations indicated that cost-effectiveness was critically dependent on the ratio between the cost of treatment and the cost of a diagnostic block. For cervical zygapophysial joint pain, reimbursements discourage best practice, both in Australia and in the United States, by rendering the use of controlled blocks more expensive than no controls. For lumbar zygapophysial joint pain, controlled blocks are cost-effective under Australian fee schedules, and under some but not all American schedules. In the name of cost-effectiveness, the US fee structure encourages presumptive therapy without regard to diagnosis, but ignores the ethical and logistic consequences of inordinately high failure rates of therapy when a diagnosis is not established using controlled blocks.Conclusions. Best practice, using placebo-controlled diagnostic blocks before neurosurgical therapy of zygapophysial joint pain, is not encouraged and rewarded in the United States. In Australia it is compensated only in the context of lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. In the interests of short-term financial savings, the US fee structure sacrifices the majority of patients to failed treatment because of lack of proper diagnosis. Clinical absurdity, rather than evidence-based, best practice is encouraged.

Sacroiliac joint pain: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment

“…In a randomized, comparative cost-effectiveness study comparing zero, one and two blocks before lumbar facet RF denervation, whereas two blocks was associated with the highest RF denervation success rate, the highest overall success rate and lowest cost per effective procedure was noted in the zero-block group [92]. Reasons for this finding, which is supported by theoretical computations [93], include the absence of false-negative blocks and the high placebo response rates for procedures [94].…”

The diagnostic utility and cost-effectiveness of selective nerve root blocks in patients considered for lumbar decompression surgery: a systematic review and economic model

“…We identified two studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of other types of spinal nerve injections [zygapophyseal (facet) joint injections and medial branch (facet nerve joint) blocks]. 47,48 Although these studies provide indirect evidence that diagnostic injections in the spine can influence the percentage of patients receiving surgery and the cost of care, they do not provide direct evidence on the costeffectiveness of diagnostic SNRB in patients with LR. We therefore constructed an economic model based on evidence from our SR on the diagnostic accuracy of SNRB and the wider literature on the costs and outcomes of diagnosis and treatment of radiculopathy.…”

Can Changes in Vital Signs Be Used to Predict the Response to Lumbar Facet Blocks and Radiofrequency Denervation? A Prospective, Correlational Study

“…18 Theoretical cost analyses have confirmed these results. 19,20 The search for ways to improve the selection of patients for facet joint denervation is complicated by the fact that most studies have demonstrated either no or only a weak association between historical and physical examination findings and injection-confirmed facetogenic pain 21,22 and between clinical findings and denervation outcomes. 9-11 Similar weak associations have been found for radiological imaging and the results of facet interventions.…”