“…From strong, persistent collagen I to the soft, transient collagen IV, a singular biopolymer can be given diverse function based on differences in assembly and post-translational modifications. While traditional covalent hydrogels often have hierarchical information imparted via processing steps, supramolecular hydrogels offer unique opportunities for providing diverse morphologies based on formulation and processing conditions. , Though the potential polymorphism during self-assembly of supramolecular assemblies can be a challenge, ,, gaining control and direction over this process has the potential to offer emergent properties from singular systems with high reproducibility rates, − as also recently highlighted by Adams et al While a difficult area of research, new analytical tools and methodologies, like intermediate quality control steps, set this up to be a promising area of innovative structure–property relationships in the near future. - Mechanoresponsiveness and complex, dynamic mechanical properties are abundant and important in natural systems. , In nature, for example, the Ruberti and Dunn groups have shown that the enzymatic degradation load of collagen is dependent on the applied mechanical force. , Likewise, fibrins’ bioactivity is regulated through a mechanochemical feedback loop; when fibrin is under mechanical stress, decreased binding of fibrin and platelets was observed, yielding less activated platelets . Hence, of particular interest in the future is the combination of supramolecular interactions with mechanoresponsive elements, such as Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) sensors, as many ECM functions are regulated by cellular tension.
- Additionally, the introduction of complex mechanical features, like stress stiffening as observed in fibrin, remains challenging in synthetic supramolecular systems.
…”