Controlled RNA contamination and degradation and its impact on qPCR gene expression in S. epidermidis biofilms

Abstract

RNA quality is of utmost importance to perform gene expression quantification by qPCR. The classical methods used to determine RNA quality are based on electrophoresis and spectrophotometer assessment, namely A(260)/A(280) and A(260)/A(230) ratios. It was previously shown that due to the complex nature of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms, RNA extraction procedures could impact mRNA quality and thus accurate quantification. Herein, we contaminated and degraded RNA extracted from S. epidermidis biofilms, and assessed the effect on gene expression by qPCR. As expected, thermal degradation of RNA had a significant impact on gene expression on two out of the three tested genes. On the other hand, the contamination of the extracted RNA yielded an interesting result: while most contaminants did not changed the purity indicators or the integrity of RNA, significant changes on gene expression levels were found. This work confirms that poor RNA extraction has an important impact in qPCR quantification, emphasizing the consequences of carry-over contaminants on gene expression studies. Additionally, our results show that the parameters commonly used to assess the quality of extracted RNA from bacterial cultures seem to be insufficient to ensure reliable gene expression determination.

Using an in-vitro biofilm model to assess the virulence potential of Bacterial Vaginosis or non-Bacterial Vaginosis Gardnerella vaginalis isolates

“…Briefly, genomic DNA was degraded with one step of DNase treatment (Fermentas, Lithuania) following manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration, purity and integrity was determined as described before 39 . Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed as previously described 38 with some modifications.…”

Critical review on biofilm methods

“…One of the key aspects for transcriptomic analysis is related with the yield and quality of the mRNA transcripts, and care should be taken when working with low magnitude changes as the differences obtained may be a result of matrix contamination (Carvalhais et al, 2013). For proteomic analysis, the biofilm matrix can also be a significant barrier to effectively access the different intracellular, membrane and parietal sub-proteomes (surfaceome) ).…”

Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: from variable nonsense to publication quality data

“…Poorly optimized reactions can result in artifactual Cq values and misinterpreted data that are difficult or even impossible to reproduce 2, 3 . For absolute quantification, data analysis is further complicated by the different sources of DNA from which the samples and standard curves are derived with unique backgrounds and contaminants that can variably affect the activity of Taq polymerase giving misleading results 4 . The Minimum Information for the Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines and related articles published thereafter define a rigorous methodology for designing qPCR experiments that assures publication of reproducible and high quality data 5–7 .…”