The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201410778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Release of Encapsulated Bioactive Volatiles by Rupture of the Capsule Wall through the Light‐Induced Generation of a Gas

Abstract: The encapsulation of photolabile 2-oxoacetates in core-shell microcapsules allows the light-induced, controlled release of bioactive compounds. On irradiation with UVA light these compounds degrade to generate an overpressure of gas inside the capsules, which expands or breaks the capsule wall. Headspace measurements confirmed the light-induced formation of CO and CO2 and the successful release of the bioactive compound, while optical microscopy demonstrated the formation of gas bubbles, the cleavage of the ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
72
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interfacial polymerization was done by following a typical procedure reported in the literature . An acrylate monomer (A1–A4) was dissolved in 15 g of the model fragrance oil, and the mixture was stirred for 15 min to form a homogeneous oil phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interfacial polymerization was done by following a typical procedure reported in the literature . An acrylate monomer (A1–A4) was dissolved in 15 g of the model fragrance oil, and the mixture was stirred for 15 min to form a homogeneous oil phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although BCP capsules are robust enough for cargo loading and release, they are semipermeable and only allow for very small molecules to be loaded and released owing to the hydrophobic shell. To overcome this disadvantage, capsules with stimuli‐responsive shells have been designed as smart nanocarriers to encapsulate functional species and release them in response to external triggers . Furthermore, to tune the release behavior, capsules with stimuli‐responsive mesoporous shells are excellent candidates for controlling the release of payloads .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] For example, release of the encapsulated load can be triggered mechanically by rubbing the capsules trapped on a surface, 13,14 by a raise of the temperature 10,15 or upon irradiation with light. 16,17 Microcapsules are nowadays present in many applications including self-healing composites, 18 ink for carbonless copy paper, 19 agrochemicals 20 or volatile perfume molecules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is a discrepancy because usually the smaller the diameter of the capsule, the larger is the surface to cover and thinner is the shell. 17 We would expect that large capsules were the most stable with the thickest shells. In contrast, we suspect that the presence of a large shell can limit the conversion of the copolymerization and would not favor the cross-linking between oligomers because of the increase of the viscosity in the shell during the polymerization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%