2004
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.93.157203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Normal and Inverse Current-Induced Magnetization Switching and Magnetoresistance in Magnetic Nanopillars

Abstract: By combining pairs of ferromagnetic metals with the same or different signs of scattering anisotropies in ferromagnetic-nonmagnetic-ferromagnetic metal nanopillars, we independently invert just the magnetoresistance, just the direction of current-induced magnetization switching, or both together, at room temperature (295 K) and at 4.2 K. In all cases studied, the switching direction is correctly predicted from the net scattering anisotropy of the fixed ferromagnet, including both bulk and interfacial contribut… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,7,8,[12][13][14][15] The devices reported here have been fabricated by a simple and reliable procedure based on using 3-D focused ion beam (FIB) milling. 17 Since in this process all the metal layers are deposited in a single ultra high vacuum cycle, excellent interface cleanliness is achieved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,7,8,[12][13][14][15] The devices reported here have been fabricated by a simple and reliable procedure based on using 3-D focused ion beam (FIB) milling. 17 Since in this process all the metal layers are deposited in a single ultra high vacuum cycle, excellent interface cleanliness is achieved.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When, however, the spin asymmetries of both layers have opposite signs, the resistance is larger in the parallel configuration and smaller in the antiparallel one (inverse GMR effect). Both, normal and inverse GMR effects have been observed experimentally [7].…”
Section: Influence Of Magnetic State On Currentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Figure 1 implies that a positive current (I > 0) tends to destabilize the parallel configuration and can switch it to antiparallel one when current exceeds a certain threshold value. On the other hand a negative current tends to destabilize the antiparallel configuration and stabilize the parallel one [5,7]. When positive current (flowing from the reference towards the sensing layer) causes transition to antiparallel magnetic configuration, the switching is known as normal CIMS.…”
Section: Influence Of Current On Magnetic Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This appears as a torque exerted locally on the magnetization. In spin valve structures the spin-transfer torque may lead to the phenomenon of current-induced magnetic switching (CIMS), predicted first theoretically [7,8], and then confirmed experimentally [9,10]. The magnetic switching can be detected via resistance measurements owing to the GMR effect.…”
Section: Spin Torque and Current-induced Switching In Metallic Spin Vmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This nonequivalence of spin channels has further consequences for transport properties of spatially nonuniform magnetic structures. Apart from the magnetoresistance phenomena (like the GMR effect), charge current in such systems is associated with spin current, and the latter can lead to magnetization switching between two stable magnetic states [7][8][9][10] or to stationary precessional states [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%