2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3507142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Nonlinear Energy Deposition In Transparent Materials: Experiments And Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,[14][15][16] Briefly, atoms are ionized through multiphoton or tunneling ionization within the focal zone of a high-intensity laser pulse. Free electrons can then absorb more photons through inverse-Bremsstrahlung absorption, gaining sufficient kinetic energy to ionize even more atoms during subsequent collisions.…”
Section: Finesse Of Transparent Tissue Cutting By Ultrafast Lasers Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[14][15][16] Briefly, atoms are ionized through multiphoton or tunneling ionization within the focal zone of a high-intensity laser pulse. Free electrons can then absorb more photons through inverse-Bremsstrahlung absorption, gaining sufficient kinetic energy to ionize even more atoms during subsequent collisions.…”
Section: Finesse Of Transparent Tissue Cutting By Ultrafast Lasers Atmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current applications include corneal ablation by excimer lasers in refractive surgery 1 , corneal dissection by femtosecond lasers in LASIK 2 or keratoplasty 3 , as well as dissection of the lens and lens capsule in cataract surgery 4,5 . Basic research into laser-tissue interaction mechanisms 6,7 has helped to introduce new lasers such as 355 nm sub-nanosecond laser 8 or 1650 nm femtosecond laser 9 to corneal flap-cutting or new applications for currently used femtosecond lasers such as refractive index shaping 10 . In this study, we look at the interactions of femtosecond pulses from Ti:Sapphire laser with lens capsule, and compare the quality of cuts produced by two wavelengths: 400 and 800 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These low bubble energy conversion efficiencies, as well as the absence of visible plasma luminescence, are hallmarks of LDP generation in which the rate of free electron generation via multi-photon and avalanche ionization processes is counteracted by electron-hole recombination which limits the free electron density in the focal volume. 8,24 Our use of sub-nanosecond pulses to form LDPs is likely due to the short cavity length of the Q-sw microchip laser that promotes single-frequency operation free of mode beating resulting in a smooth and reproducible temporal pulse shape. 25 For all the media formulations tested, we find a high-energy regime characterized by both bright plasma luminescence and larger bubble formation with conversion efficiencies g տ 2%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The production of microscopic bubbles via LDP formation using 500 ps laser microbeam irradiation at 0.25 NA is unprecedented and approaches the precision achieved using femtosecond pulses. 8,24 For example, Vogel and co-workers have shown that irradiation of DI water using femtosecond pulsed microbeams at 0.9 NA resulted in maximum bubble radii of R max ¼ 1-5 lm for k ¼ 1040 nm and R max < 1-3.5 lm for k ¼ 520 nm. 8 Moreover, the LDP formation with subnanosecond pulses at low NA enables rapid and precise cellular modification over large areas which is simply not possible using femtosecond laser irradiation without implementation of strategies to mitigate self-focusing and laser beam filamentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%