Cictp 2016 2016
DOI: 10.1061/9780784479896.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled Experiments to Examine Different Exit Designs on Crowd Evacuation Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other reasonable obstacle settings that could help improve the evacuation efficiency have also been evaluated based on simulation [7,8]. This phenomenon tends to be more apparent in the case of silo [9], sheep [10] and mice [11] outflow without self-awareness or with high competition, while hard to be observed in non-emergency egress conditions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other reasonable obstacle settings that could help improve the evacuation efficiency have also been evaluated based on simulation [7,8]. This phenomenon tends to be more apparent in the case of silo [9], sheep [10] and mice [11] outflow without self-awareness or with high competition, while hard to be observed in non-emergency egress conditions [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies reveal that the obstacle effect can improve pedestrian outflows [57,62,63]. In contrast, other studies found placing an obstacle around the exit may increase [64,65] or have no effect [66] on evacuation time. Therefore, previous research has established the effectiveness of placing obstacles in front of exits in improving evacuation efficiency.…”
Section: Example 3: Obstacle Effect At the Evacuation Phrasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To reduce congestion at the exit and increase the evacuation rate in an emergency, it is found that placing an obstacle in front of the exit may be helpful. [17] Many studies have tested the influence of obstacles on the exit evacuation rate through numerical simulation models, [4,[25][26][27] human participant experiments, [28][29][30] and nonhuman biological experiments. [31][32][33] In these studies, opinions on the effectiveness of obstacles in increasing the flow rate at the exit are inconsistent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%