1991
DOI: 10.1002/pc.750120109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled energy dissipation in fibrous composites. II: Microscopic failure mechanisms

Abstract: Mechanical properties and microscopic fracture mechanisms of continuous fiber reinforced polymer composites were investigated. Perforated polyimide films (e.g. Kapton@) were added between composite prepreg layers to modify the interlaminar bonding strength. Addition of highly perforated films can increase the toughness of unidirectional glass/epoxy composites without a n appreciable reduction in strength. The fibrous composites studied exhibit two fracture modes (compressive and tensile) when failed by three-p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microstructural failure mechanisms are strongly dependant on several factors in any composite material such as the nature of the components, reinforcement/matrix interface, volume fractions, reinforcement geometry etc. Different types of damage mechanisms have been identified for fiber-reinforced composites such as matrix damage (matrix micro-cracking, coalescence of micro-cracks, matrix/matrix friction), interfacial debonding (fiber/matrix, bundle/matrix), fiber/matrix and fiber/fiber friction and fiber and bundle breaks [1][2][3]. The identification and evaluation of damage or fracture stages of polymer composites are extremely complex due to a composite material exhibiting heterogeneous nature, lacking of uniformity in composition owing to its components and, therefore, the assignment may be controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microstructural failure mechanisms are strongly dependant on several factors in any composite material such as the nature of the components, reinforcement/matrix interface, volume fractions, reinforcement geometry etc. Different types of damage mechanisms have been identified for fiber-reinforced composites such as matrix damage (matrix micro-cracking, coalescence of micro-cracks, matrix/matrix friction), interfacial debonding (fiber/matrix, bundle/matrix), fiber/matrix and fiber/fiber friction and fiber and bundle breaks [1][2][3]. The identification and evaluation of damage or fracture stages of polymer composites are extremely complex due to a composite material exhibiting heterogeneous nature, lacking of uniformity in composition owing to its components and, therefore, the assignment may be controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These features include the stress level when micro-fracture begins and the fracture mechanisms operating during various stages of a fracture process. 8 Rios-Soberanis et al 9 proved that the architecture/geometry of textiles is an essential factor that influences the mechanical behavior of a composite material and that it is dependent on the loading orientation. AE signals in an epoxy/ polypropylene geotextile composite exhibited higher density in comparison to an epoxy/polyethylene-terephthalate geotextile composite.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%