1963
DOI: 10.3109/00016486309139990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled “Ear Aspiration” of Air: A “physiological” test of the tubal function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1965
1965
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the method of Flisberg et al (1963), tubal opening was examined by the pressure change in the closed ear space. Before the experimental procedure, the ear drum was perforated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the method of Flisberg et al (1963), tubal opening was examined by the pressure change in the closed ear space. Before the experimental procedure, the ear drum was perforated.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The POP and PCP were determined by the forced-response test initially described by Flisberg et al 14 Time-pressure schematic demonstrates pressure changes within each eustachian tube function test session. After induction of anesthesia, we placed the rats in the right lateral recumbent position in order to visualize their left tympanic membrane (TM) with the operating microscope.…”
Section: Surgical Preparation and Perioperativementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include manometry [3,4], tympanometry [5], eustachian tube endoscopy [6,7], dye studies with fl uorescein [7,8] and saccharin [9] and sonotubometry [10]. The infl ation-defl ation test was fi rst reported by Flisberg et al [11]. It has been adapted for routine clinical use by Bluestone et al [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%