2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled drug release to the inner ear: Concepts, materials, mechanisms, and performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of the blood-labyrinth barrier hampers systemic drug administration to the inner ear; therefore, the different methods and devices for enhancing local drug delivery have been devised for improving medical therapies for inner ear diseases (38). Most of these delivery devices and drug carriers are applied via the external auditory canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the blood-labyrinth barrier hampers systemic drug administration to the inner ear; therefore, the different methods and devices for enhancing local drug delivery have been devised for improving medical therapies for inner ear diseases (38). Most of these delivery devices and drug carriers are applied via the external auditory canal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 5% GelMA hydrogels degraded within 3 h, while 10% and 15% GelMA followed a similar degradation rate for the first four hours and completely degraded after 6 h and 8 h, respectively. The linearity of the hydrogel degradation rate suggests a near zero-order degradation kinetic which occurs when the rate of hydrogel bond cleavage is faster than the diffusion rate of the enzyme solution through the hydrogel and is characteristic of a surface erosion [50,51,70,71]. Enzymatic release of the drug followed a similar trend; however, degradation was slower compared to GelMA alone, and the GelMA-DDS degraded within 2 h, 8 h, and 14 h for 5%, 10%, and 15% GelMA, respectively, irrespective of the Abraxane ® dose.…”
Section: Release Through Enzymatic Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local administration provides the advantage of precise targeting and avoids the risk of systemic adverse events (El Kechai et al, 2015;Li et al, 2017;Hao and Li, 2019;Piu and Bishop, 2019). The methods of local drug administration to the inner ear include intratympanic and intracochlear approaches, where the latter offers a direct delivery route to achieve a greater drug bioavailability by either penetrating right through the round window membrane (RWM) or through an opening in the cochlear bony wall (El Kechai et al, 2015;Mäder et al, 2018). However, the intracochlear approach poses a high risk of inner ear damage and hearing loss and is therefore mainly employed as a combined procedure during cochlear implant surgery (Mccall et al, 2010;Chin and Diaz, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the short residence times for contact with the RWM, several delivery devices, such as the MicroWick, microcathers, and osmotic pumps, have been developed to prolong the duration of medication contact with the RWM. Delivery materials and agents such as gelfoam, hyaluronic acid hydrogels, histamine, nanoparticles, and nanovesicles can also provide a sustained inner ear delivery via the RWM (El Kechai et al, 2015;Mäder et al, 2018;Creber et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%