2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controlled categorisation processing in brand extension evaluation by Indo-European language speakers. An ERP study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
34
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although our experimental paradigm was identical to those in the previous goods-to-goods brand extension studies ( Ma et al, 2007 , 2008 , 2014b ; Fudali-Czyż et al, 2016 ; Shang et al, 2017 ), the ERP waveforms of our study exhibited differences from the previous ones. In our study, the ERPs showed that three positive or negative peaks—N2 (170∼230 ms), P3 (270∼330 ms), and N400 (370∼430 ms)—were prominent in every stimulus group ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Although our experimental paradigm was identical to those in the previous goods-to-goods brand extension studies ( Ma et al, 2007 , 2008 , 2014b ; Fudali-Czyż et al, 2016 ; Shang et al, 2017 ), the ERP waveforms of our study exhibited differences from the previous ones. In our study, the ERPs showed that three positive or negative peaks—N2 (170∼230 ms), P3 (270∼330 ms), and N400 (370∼430 ms)—were prominent in every stimulus group ( Figure 5 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The recorded EEG data were analyzed offline using the MATLAB software (version 2016a, MathWorks, Inc., MA, United States). Among the 31 channels, the following 9 channels were selected for the analysis to be comparable with the previous results ( Ma et al, 2014b ; Fudali-Czyż et al, 2016 ): F3, Fz, F4, C3, Cz, C4, P3, Pz, and P4. Although other fronto-central (FC9, FC5, FC1, FC2, FC6, and FC10) and centro-parietal (CP5, CP1, CP2, and CP6) channels were additionally analyzed in the previous studies, we did not include them in the analysis because our EEG system did not provide midline channels needed to compare the results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations