2021
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.1c12973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllably Doping Nitrogen into 1T/2H MoS2 Heterostructure Nanosheets for Enhanced Supercapacitive and Electrocatalytic Performance by Low-Power N2 Plasma

Abstract: Molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) is a promising candidate for use as a supercapacitor electrode material and non-noble-metal electrocatalyst owing to its relatively high theoretical specific capacitance, Pt-like electronic feature, and graphene-like structure. However, insufficient electrochemically active sites along with poor conductivity significantly hinder its practical application. Heteroatom doping and phase engineering have been regarded as effective ways to overcome the inherent limitations of MoS 2 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
35
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The optimal N-MoS 2 /rGO presents an outstanding performance with the lowest overpotential (130 mV) to reach 10 mA•cm −2 in comparison with MoS 2 (243 mV), N-MoS 2 (223 mV), and MoS 2 /rGO (193 mV) (Figures 4A and S13). The HER overpotential at 10 mA•cm −2 is also lower than or comparable to those obtained by reported MoS 2 or Mo-based electrocatalysts (Table S1), such as Metallic-MoS 2 (175 mV@10 mA• cm −2 ), 1 defective-MoS 2 /rGO (154.77 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 33 exfoliated 1T-MoS 2 (187 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 34 1T-MoS 2 (187 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 35 1T-MoS 2 /CFP (219 mV@10 mA• cm −2 ), 36 MNG-40 (157 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 37 1T/2H-MoS 2 heterostructure (131 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 38 DBC-MoS 2 -PANI2 (196 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 39 Mo/S (0.2) −450 (130 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 40 and Co 9 S 8 /MoS x (161 mV@10 mA• cm −2 ). 41 1T-MoS 2 also accelerates the HER kinetics and promotes the electrocatalytic activity.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal N-MoS 2 /rGO presents an outstanding performance with the lowest overpotential (130 mV) to reach 10 mA•cm −2 in comparison with MoS 2 (243 mV), N-MoS 2 (223 mV), and MoS 2 /rGO (193 mV) (Figures 4A and S13). The HER overpotential at 10 mA•cm −2 is also lower than or comparable to those obtained by reported MoS 2 or Mo-based electrocatalysts (Table S1), such as Metallic-MoS 2 (175 mV@10 mA• cm −2 ), 1 defective-MoS 2 /rGO (154.77 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 33 exfoliated 1T-MoS 2 (187 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 34 1T-MoS 2 (187 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 35 1T-MoS 2 /CFP (219 mV@10 mA• cm −2 ), 36 MNG-40 (157 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 37 1T/2H-MoS 2 heterostructure (131 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 38 DBC-MoS 2 -PANI2 (196 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 39 Mo/S (0.2) −450 (130 mV@10 mA•cm −2 ), 40 and Co 9 S 8 /MoS x (161 mV@10 mA• cm −2 ). 41 1T-MoS 2 also accelerates the HER kinetics and promotes the electrocatalytic activity.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tafel tests were characterized to further assess the impact of N content on the corrosion rate of these materials, as well as their ability to release electrons . Generally, the polarization voltage ( E corr ) and the cathode slope could reflect the electron transfer and the degree of reduction reactions, respectively. , Polarization curves (Figure d and Table S5) show that the measured values of both E corr and cathode slope for the nitridated materials were much smaller than that of nZVI, suggesting the accelerated electron transfer, lower overpotential of catalytic reactions, and more thorough reduction reactions. In addition, the measured values of the cathode slope tended to decrease as the increase of the N content, and the nitridated material with a lower cathode slope value also shows higher corrosion current density ( I corr ), indicating their high reactivity with TCE as discussed below.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy and power density were derived from galvanostatic charging–discharging at various current densities. The energy density and power density are evaluated using eqs and , respectively. where E is the energy density, P is the power density, C sp is the gravimetric specific capacitance calculated through GCDs, V is the voltage window, and Δ t is the discharge time. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The layered structure provides more surface area for charge storage and different oxidation states from +2 to +6 of the central Mo atoms to increase the pseudocapacitance. Generally, the 1T phase exhibits an improved hydrophilic behavior and an excellent electrical conductivity higher than that of 2H–MoS 2 , which directs to a higher specific capacitance in a liquid electrolyte. Accordingly, 1T MoS 2 could be a suitable electrode material for manufacturing high-performance solid-state SCs. On the other hand, layered 1T-MoS 2 nanosheets lead to restacking due to the out-of-plane van der Waals (vdW) force of attraction between adjacent layers, reducing the active surface area and preventing effective electrolyte ion diffusion, ensuing in a faster decay of electrochemical performance. To control the reaggregation and possible phase change of 1T-MoS 2 , which leads to poor performance, a solution-processable method to get MoS 2 nanosheets with stable dispersion is required to explore the spectrum of practical uses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%