2017
DOI: 10.1021/acssensors.7b00385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllable Shrinking of Glass Capillary Nanopores Down to sub-10 nm by Wet-Chemical Silanization for Signal-Enhanced DNA Translocation

Abstract: Diameter is a major concern for nanopore based sensing. However, directly pulling glass capillary nanopore with diameter down to sub-10 nm is very difficult. So, post treatment is sometimes necessary. Herein, we demonstrate a facile and effective wet-chemical method to shrink the diameter of glass capillary nanopore from several tens of nanometers to sub-10 nm by disodium silicate hydrolysis. Its benefits for DNA translocation are investigated. The shrinking of glass capillary nanopore not only slows down DNA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a standard solid-state-nanopore experiment, the chip is sandwiched between two rubber O-rings that seal two compartments containing the electrolyte solution ( Fig.3f). Alternatively, solid-state pores of ~5-50 nm size can be made by mechanical pulling of hollow glass (SiO2) pipettes 87,88 , which are immersed in electrolyte during the measurement. Current sensing, amplification, and recording is the same as for biological nanopores.…”
Section: Noise In Solid-state Nanoporesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a standard solid-state-nanopore experiment, the chip is sandwiched between two rubber O-rings that seal two compartments containing the electrolyte solution ( Fig.3f). Alternatively, solid-state pores of ~5-50 nm size can be made by mechanical pulling of hollow glass (SiO2) pipettes 87,88 , which are immersed in electrolyte during the measurement. Current sensing, amplification, and recording is the same as for biological nanopores.…”
Section: Noise In Solid-state Nanoporesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to the advances in nanotechnology, especially in nanofabrication, artificial solid‐state nanopores have been achieved by different ways. They include i) silicon nitride nanopores drilled by ion beam sculpting, [ 27 ] transmission electron microscopy (TEM) technique [ 28 ] or controlled dielectric breakdown (CDB) technique; [ 29 ] ii) nanotubes (NT) synthesized by catalytic particles coupled with chemical vapor deposition (CVD), [ 30 ] carbon‐arc discharge, and laser; [ 31 ] iii) 2D nanopores such as graphene, [ 32 ] boron nitride, [ 33 ] and molybdenum disulfide [ 34 ] opened by ablation via focused electron‐beam irradiation in a TEM; [ 35 ] iv) nanopipette made through laser‐assisted pulling; [ 36 ] v) polymer nanopore opened by track‐etching technique. [ 37 ] The properties of these nanopores can be very different according to their size, geometry, or surface state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The side wall effect could play an important role in SICM imaging; therefore, care should be taken in limiting the wall dimensions of the probe when pushing toward highresolution. Recent works aiming to increase the resolution by using small nanopores (e.g., via local physical shrinking of the probe aperture 24,25 or using biological pores in lipid membranes 26,27 ) concomitantly result in the formation of probes with bigger walls, which will most likely face such side wall imaging effects introduced herein.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%