2010
DOI: 10.2514/1.44758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllable Drogue for Automated Aerial Refueling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the measurable effect on the drogue position due to the receiver fore-body aerodynamic effect is estimated by 1.0ft ~1.2ft in the previous section, the actuator is expected to generate about 8.67lbf lateral force and 13.67lbf vertical force, all in a static sense, during a receiver coupling phase for this reference flight condition. A recent study [6] mentions a wind-tunnel test performed by Texas A&M University, which showed 36.0lbf (at 170KIAS, knots indicated airspeed) to 76.0lbf (at 250KIAS) of side force generation by canopy manipulation concept. The drag force generated by a drogue depends on its various configuration characteristics such as strut angle, canopy area, and gore spacing [7], and the required force calculated using eq.…”
Section: Hose-drogue Control Design Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As the measurable effect on the drogue position due to the receiver fore-body aerodynamic effect is estimated by 1.0ft ~1.2ft in the previous section, the actuator is expected to generate about 8.67lbf lateral force and 13.67lbf vertical force, all in a static sense, during a receiver coupling phase for this reference flight condition. A recent study [6] mentions a wind-tunnel test performed by Texas A&M University, which showed 36.0lbf (at 170KIAS, knots indicated airspeed) to 76.0lbf (at 250KIAS) of side force generation by canopy manipulation concept. The drag force generated by a drogue depends on its various configuration characteristics such as strut angle, canopy area, and gore spacing [7], and the required force calculated using eq.…”
Section: Hose-drogue Control Design Modelmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The approach to equip an air-to-air refueling drogue with aerodynamic control surfaces was also examined in recent studies [6], [7], [8]. The main goal of these studies was to compensate disturbances due to wake vortices or turbulences but not to actively position the drogue and perform the capturing maneuver.…”
Section: Figure 2: Iac With Acd Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For that reason, recently, several research lines about the stability of the system have been developed, emphasizing how to control the drogue and the hose once they have been deployed. For example, the work of [9][10][11] presented methods for controlling an automatic refueling drogue and that of [12] studied an active control strategy based on automatic control surfaces. However, the possibility of aeroelastic problems in aerial refueling systems with hoses and drogues have barely been investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%