2008
DOI: 10.1109/tac.2008.919548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Controllability of a Leader–Follower Dynamic Network With Switching Topology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
172
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
172
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the second case, the same leader set S is chosen and used for all topologies [84]. Under this strategy, we consider two possible leader selection metrics, namely the average-case…”
Section: Leader Selection Under Switching Between Predefined Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the second case, the same leader set S is chosen and used for all topologies [84]. Under this strategy, we consider two possible leader selection metrics, namely the average-case…”
Section: Leader Selection Under Switching Between Predefined Topologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaders can be selected in order to improve robustness to these noise injection attacks in two ways. In the first case, a fixed set of leaders is used for the lifetime of the system, and hence must be chosen to minimize the worst-case error [84]. In the second case, the nodes may be equipped with sensing hardware that allows them to monitor their environment, observe increased noise levels, and update the set of leaders accordingly [89].…”
Section: Robustness To Link Noise Injection Attacksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [7], the controllability was characterized by graph theory. In [12], the controllability problem was studied under both fixed and switching topologies for continuous-time case, and then for discrete-time case [11]. Different from the classical control system, the dynamical behavior of networked systems heavily relies on how the network is connected, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%