2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control the effects caused by noise parameter fluctuations to improve pharmaceutical process robustness: A case study of design space development for an ethanol precipitation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Familiar variation rules were observed in most of other chemical markers, including acetate, malonate, fructose, sucrose, ra nose, stachyose, mannotriose, DSS, LA, RA, SaB, SaA. Changing rules of several phenolic acids studied in this article were consistent with previous reports 12,14,15 . In the model of PA, the values of R 2 are less than 0.5, which suggests that the models cannot explain most of the variability in the observed data and show signi cant lack of t. According to the original data, in the most processes of ethanol precipitation, retention ratio of PA kept more than 0.8, indicating PA owned less risk of uctuation during the ethanol precipitation progress and was an easy-to-control indicator of ethanol precipitation, although it suffered loss to some extent.…”
Section: Mlr For Ethanol Precipitation Process Modeling and Understansupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Familiar variation rules were observed in most of other chemical markers, including acetate, malonate, fructose, sucrose, ra nose, stachyose, mannotriose, DSS, LA, RA, SaB, SaA. Changing rules of several phenolic acids studied in this article were consistent with previous reports 12,14,15 . In the model of PA, the values of R 2 are less than 0.5, which suggests that the models cannot explain most of the variability in the observed data and show signi cant lack of t. According to the original data, in the most processes of ethanol precipitation, retention ratio of PA kept more than 0.8, indicating PA owned less risk of uctuation during the ethanol precipitation progress and was an easy-to-control indicator of ethanol precipitation, although it suffered loss to some extent.…”
Section: Mlr For Ethanol Precipitation Process Modeling and Understansupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The knowledge of the compounds affected by this process is an important part of the research and development of HMs. To understand the process of ethanol precipitation, numerous studies have tested how precipitation conditions, such as temperature, ethanol consumption, concentration of ethanol, stirring speed and the attributes of materials, affect the process performance in recently years [11][12][13][14][15][16] . Most of these studies focused on the retention of one or a few bioactive compounds, impurity removal rate, and other performance attributes of precipitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Peterson et al gave several examples using the Bayesian predictive method to calculate the probability-based design space [ 4 , 12 ]. Our group developed design spaces for the ethanol precipitation process [ 13 ], the water precipitation process [ 14 ], and the extraction process [ 15 ] using a Monte Carlo simulation method. The Monte Carlo simulation method was also used successfully in the design space development for several analytical methods [ 16 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monte-Carlo and Bayesian methods are commonly used to calculate this probability [11] [13] . Recently, ethanol precipitation and water precipitation, two separation processes that are widely applied in the manufacturing of botanical drugs [14] , [15] , have been successfully optimized according to the QbD paradigm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%