Control strategies for integration of electric motor assist and functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic cycling: utility for exercise testing and mobile cycling
Abstract:Abstract-Aim:The aim of this study was to investigate feedback control strategies for integration of electric motor assist and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for paraplegic cycling, with particular focus on development of a testbed for exercise testing in FES cycling, in which both cycling cadence and workrate are simultaneously well controlled and contemporary physiological measures of exercise performance derived. A second aim was to investigate the possible benefits of the approach for mobile, recr… Show more
“…Exercise tests were carried out using a feedback control system with motor assistance that allowed accurate quantification of PO, particularly at low levels (below that necessary to turn the pedals). 20 A progressive incremental exercise test was performed at 50 rpm, while the work rate was increased by 1-2 W every minute until it failed to increase (i.e., 100% stimulation intensity). PO during cycling was calculated from the cadence and torque measured at the crankshaft (SRM Powermeter; Schoberer Rad Messtechnik GmbH, Germany).…”
Inactivity and muscular adaptations following spinal cord injury (SCI) result in secondary complications such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, and pressure sores. Functional electrically stimulated (FES) cycling can potentially reduce these complications, but previous studies have provided inconsistent results. We studied the effect of intensive long-term FES cycle training on muscle properties in 11 SCI subjects (mean +/- SEM: 41.8 +/- 2.3 years) who had trained for up to 1 hour/day, 5 days/week, for 1 year. Comparative measurements were made in 10 able-bodied (AB) subjects. Quadriceps maximal electrically stimulated torque increased fivefold (n = 5), but remained lower than in AB individuals. Relative force response at 1 HZ decreased, relaxation rate remained unchanged, and fatigue resistance improved significantly. Power output (PO) improved to a lesser extent than quadriceps torque and not to a greater extent than has been reported previously. We need to understand the factors that limit PO in order to maximize the benefits of FES cycling.
“…Exercise tests were carried out using a feedback control system with motor assistance that allowed accurate quantification of PO, particularly at low levels (below that necessary to turn the pedals). 20 A progressive incremental exercise test was performed at 50 rpm, while the work rate was increased by 1-2 W every minute until it failed to increase (i.e., 100% stimulation intensity). PO during cycling was calculated from the cadence and torque measured at the crankshaft (SRM Powermeter; Schoberer Rad Messtechnik GmbH, Germany).…”
Inactivity and muscular adaptations following spinal cord injury (SCI) result in secondary complications such as cardiovascular disease, obesity, and pressure sores. Functional electrically stimulated (FES) cycling can potentially reduce these complications, but previous studies have provided inconsistent results. We studied the effect of intensive long-term FES cycle training on muscle properties in 11 SCI subjects (mean +/- SEM: 41.8 +/- 2.3 years) who had trained for up to 1 hour/day, 5 days/week, for 1 year. Comparative measurements were made in 10 able-bodied (AB) subjects. Quadriceps maximal electrically stimulated torque increased fivefold (n = 5), but remained lower than in AB individuals. Relative force response at 1 HZ decreased, relaxation rate remained unchanged, and fatigue resistance improved significantly. Power output (PO) improved to a lesser extent than quadriceps torque and not to a greater extent than has been reported previously. We need to understand the factors that limit PO in order to maximize the benefits of FES cycling.
“…We utilized a recumbent tricycle (Inspired Cycle Engineering Ltd., UK), adapted for paraplegic FES-cycling and arranged for static ergometry [26] (see figure 1). The tricycle is equipped with an electric motor, connected through gearing to a rear drive wheel, and coupled to the cranks at the front of the tricycle.…”
Section: Apparatusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full technical details of these feedback control systems and a discussion of the utility of the system for exercise testing are given in [26].…”
Aim: The energy efficiency of FES-cycling in spinal cord injured subjects is very much lower than that of normal cycling, and efficiency is dependent upon the parameters of muscle stimulation. We investigated measures which can be used to evaluate the effect on cycling performance of changes in stimulation parameters, and which might therefore be used to optimise them. We aimed to determine whether oxygen-cost and stimulation-cost measurements are sensitive enough to allow discrimination between the efficacy of different activation ranges for stimulation of each muscle group during constant-power cycling.
Methods:We employed a custom FES-cycling ergometer system, with accurate control of cadence and stimulated exercise workrate. Two sets of muscle activation angles ("stimulation patterns"), denoted "P1" and "P2", were applied repeatedly (eight times each) during constant-power cycling, in a repeated measures design with a single paraplegic subject. Pulmonary oxygen uptake was measured in real time and used to determine the oxygen cost of the exercise. A new measure of stimulation cost of the exercise is proposed, which represents the total rate of stimulation charge applied to the stimulated muscle groups during cycling. A number of energy-efficiency measures were also estimated.Results: Average oxygen cost and stimulation cost of P1 were found to be significantly lower than those for P2 (paired t-test, p<0.05): oxygen costs were 0.56 ± 0.03 l · min −1 and 0.61 ± 0.04 l · min −1 (mean ± sd), respectively; stimulation costs were 74.91 ± 12.15 mC · min −1 and 100.30 ± 14.78 mC · min −1 (mean ± sd), respectively. Correspondingly, all efficiency estimates for P1 were greater than those for P2.
Conclusion:Oxygen-and stimulation-cost measures both allow discrimination between the efficacy of different muscle activation patterns during constant-power FES-cycling. However, stimulation cost is more easily determined in real time, and responds more rapidly and with greatly improved signal-to-noise properties than the ventilatory oxygen uptake measurements required for estimation of oxygen cost. These measures may find utility in the adjustment of stimulation patterns for achievement of optimal cycling performance.
“…Mobile cycling with FES has been studied to develop locomotion device mainly for paraplegic subjects [4]- [7]. Integration of electric motor assist and FES has also been studied for this purpose [8], [9]. In addition to using the FES cycling as a mobility device, application of FES cycling to motor rehabilitation has been studied [10]- [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In oder to achieve widespread use of FES cycling, an FES cycling system easy to use for a user is desired. Current systems for FES mobile cycling use mainly a recumbent tricycle with ankle orthosis, and with or without electric power assist [6], [8]. Cycling wheelchairs incorporated a rotary encoder [10] or a motor assistance with an encoder [9] was also developed as experimental systems.…”
SUMMARYThe cycling wheelchair "Profhand" was developed in Japan as locomotion and lower limb rehabilitation device for hemiplegic subjects and elderly persons. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) control of paralyzed lower limbs enables application of the Profhand to paraplegic subjects as a rehabilitation device. In this paper, simplified muscle stimulation control for FES cycling with Profhand was examined for practical application, because cycling speed was low and not stable in our preliminary study and there was a difficulty in setting stimulation electrodes for the gluteus maximus. First, a guideline of target cycling speed to be achieved by FES cycling was determined from voluntary cycling with healthy subjects in order to evaluate FES cycling control. The cycling speed of 0.6m/s was determined as acceptable value and 1.0m/s was as ideal one. Then, stimulation to the gluteus maximus and that to the dorsiflexor muscles in addition to the quadriceps femoris were examined for simple FES cycling control for Profhand with healthy subjects. Stimulation timing was adjusted automatically during cycling based on muscle response time to electrical stimulation and cycling speed, which was shown to be effective for FES cycling control. Simple FES cycling control with Profhand removing stimulation to the gluteus maximus was found to be feasible. Stimulation to the dorsiflexor muscles with the quadriceps femoris was suggested to be effective for practical, simple FES cycling with Profhand in case of removing the gluteus maximus stimulation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.