AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-2187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Control strategies for an experimental morphing wing model

Abstract: The paper presents the control strategies used in an experimental morphing wing model starting from the open loop architecture until a real time optimized closed loop architecture. Three control methods are exposed here, methods designed to obtain and maintain some optimized airfoils during the wind tunnel tests. Also, for all designed architectures the experimental control results are shown. First method uses a database stored in the computer memory, database which contains some optimized airfoils correlated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the project was finalised by developing an automatic system that, based on the information related to the pressure distribution along the wing chord, moved the transition point from the laminar to the turbulent regime closer to the trailing edge in order to obtain a larger laminar flow region. Based on the strong nonlinear behaviour of the SMA actuators, but also in strong correlation with the project experimental model development phase, different control strategies were used, starting from the open loop architecture to a real-time optimised closed loop architecture (2,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . After this big collaborative project, our morphing wing experience continued with the design, optimisation, manufacturing and testing of various deformable wings in our proper wind tunnel at ETS in Montreal (Price-Païdoussis wind tunnel).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the project was finalised by developing an automatic system that, based on the information related to the pressure distribution along the wing chord, moved the transition point from the laminar to the turbulent regime closer to the trailing edge in order to obtain a larger laminar flow region. Based on the strong nonlinear behaviour of the SMA actuators, but also in strong correlation with the project experimental model development phase, different control strategies were used, starting from the open loop architecture to a real-time optimised closed loop architecture (2,(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29) . After this big collaborative project, our morphing wing experience continued with the design, optimisation, manufacturing and testing of various deformable wings in our proper wind tunnel at ETS in Montreal (Price-Païdoussis wind tunnel).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow cases were chosen by combining several Mach numbers and angles of attack. The reference values for the controllers were the necessary actuators displacements stored in the database, obtained as differences between the optimised aerofoils and reference aerofoil at the level of the actuation lines (29,30) . In its final configuration, called "closed loop", the morphing wing model was controlled by using a method based on the estimated position of the transition point by using the pressure information provided by the sensors fixed on the wing upper surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this configuration, the first control method of the actuation lines was used as inner loop. The methodology implemented an optimiser code designed to find the best actuation configuration for the two actuation lines in order to maximise the position of the transition bringing it closer to the trailing edge (30)(31)(32) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback from the controlled system was provided by two linear variable differential transformer (LVDT), while six thermocouples were used to sense the actuator position and its temperature respectively. [18][19][20][21][22] The configuration tested previously, regarding the morphing wing project developed at ETS, was called ''open-loop'' configuration or architecture although the actuator position has been controlled. This convention has been adopted to make the difference between control based on pressure sensor data and control based on LVDT as feedback signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best wing shape for a flow condition was achieved based on the real-time optimization algorithm finding the best actuation combination between the two actuation lines maximizing the delay of the transition; the optimization algorithm combined ''the gradient ascent'' or ''hill climbing'' method with the ''simulated annealing'' method. 19,23,24 Kammegne et al [25][26][27] also realized at Research Laboratory in Active Controls, Avionics and Aeroservoelasticity (LARCASE), in ETS, a new actuation mechanism for a morphing wing prototype (ATR-42). It consisted of two electrical machines coupled to two eccentric axes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%